A probabilistic approach to uncertainty quantification with limited information

Abstract Many safety assessments depend upon models that rely on probabilistic characterizations about which there is incomplete knowledge. For example, a system model may depend upon the time to failure of a piece of equipment for which no failures have actually been observed. The analysts in this case are faced with the task of developing a failure model for the equipment in question, having very limited knowledge about either the correct form of the failure distribution or the statistical parameters that characterize the distribution. They may assume that the process conforms to a Weibull or log-normal distribution or that it can be characterized by a particular mean or variance, but those assumptions impart more knowledge to the analysis than is actually available. To address this challenge, we propose a method where random variables comprising equivalence classes constrained by the available information are approximated using polynomial chaos expansions (PCEs). The PCE approximations are based on rigorous mathematical concepts developed from functional analysis and measure theory. The method has been codified in a computational tool, AVOCET, and has been applied successfully to example problems. Results indicate that it should be applicable to a broad range of engineering problems that are characterized by both irreducible andreducible uncertainty.

[1]  W. T. Martin,et al.  The Orthogonal Development of Non-Linear Functionals in Series of Fourier-Hermite Functionals , 1947 .

[2]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[3]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[4]  Thomas L. Paez,et al.  A nondeterministic shock and vibration application using polynomial chaos expansions , 2000 .

[5]  R. Mazo On the theory of brownian motion , 1973 .

[6]  S. Fomin,et al.  Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis , 1961 .

[7]  Alfredo Ang H.-S.,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, vol i : basic principles , 1979 .

[8]  N. Wiener,et al.  Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory , 1964 .

[9]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[10]  M. Zwaan An introduction to hilbert space , 1990 .

[11]  A. Jazwinski Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory , 1970 .

[12]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[13]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[14]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[15]  A. Friedman Foundations of modern analysis , 1970 .

[16]  C. Ray Smith,et al.  Maximum-entropy and Bayesian methods in science and engineering , 1988 .

[17]  Michel Loève,et al.  Probability Theory I , 1977 .

[18]  R. Wasserstein Monte Carlo Methods, Volume 1: Basics , 1989 .

[19]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[20]  N. Bershad,et al.  Random differential equations in science and engineering , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[22]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Challenge Problems : Uncertainty in System Response Given Uncertain Parameters ( DRAFT : November 29 , 2001 ) , 2001 .

[23]  N. Wiener The Homogeneous Chaos , 1938 .