Generics and Mental Representations

It is widely agreed that generics tolerate exceptions. It turns out, however, thatexceptions are tolerated only so long as they do not violate homogeneity:when the exceptions are not concentrated in a salient “chunk” of the domain ofthe generic. The criterion for salience of a chunk is cognitive: it is dependent onthe way in which the domain is mentally represented. Findings of psychologicalexperiments about the ways in which different domains are represented, and thefactors affecting such representations, account for judgments of generic sentences,facts which cannot be explained by linguistics alone.The reason for the homogeneity requirement itself is, in turn, also dependenton cognitive considerations. Generics express default rules, and psychologicalfindings have shown that, the more homogeneous the domain, the easier it isfor subjects to infer rules about it. Thus, cognitive results form a crucial part of a comprehensive account of the meaningof a linguistic expression.

[1]  B. Tversky,et al.  Objects, parts, and categories. , 1984 .

[2]  Alice ter Meulen,et al.  Genericity: An Introduction , 1995 .

[3]  D. D. Sadler,et al.  Context effects on semantic domains as seen in analogy solution. , 1993 .

[4]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  Handbook of Logic and Language , 1996 .

[5]  Moonja P. Kim,et al.  The Method of Sorting as a Data-Gathering Procedure in Multivariate Research. , 1975, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[7]  J. Bransford,et al.  Comprehension and semantic flexibility , 1974 .

[8]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  The Verification of Semantic Relations in a Same-Different Paradigm: An Asymmetry in Semantic Memory. , 1976 .

[9]  Paul Hemeren,et al.  Frequency, ordinal position and semantic distance as measures of cross-cultural stability and hierarchies for action verbs , 1996 .

[10]  Ernest Lepore,et al.  New directions in semantics , 1987, Cognitive science series : Collections.

[11]  Ariel Cohen,et al.  Default Reasoning and Generics , 1997, Comput. Intell..

[12]  N. Henley A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms , 1969 .

[13]  Noun Phrases, Quantifiers, and Generic Names , 1991 .

[14]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[15]  Lenhart K. Schubert,et al.  Problems in the representation of the logical form of generics, plurals, and mass nouns , 1987 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Additive similarity trees , 1977 .

[17]  A. Cohen Generics, Frequency Adverbs, and Probability , 1999 .

[18]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concepts and Categorization , 2003 .

[19]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Think Generic!: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences , 1999 .

[20]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical methods and scientific inference. , 1957 .

[21]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Beth Adelson,et al.  Comparing Natural and Abstract Categories: A Case Study from Computer Science , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Category-Based Induction , 1990 .

[24]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces. , 1986 .

[25]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Approaches to Natural Language , 1973 .

[26]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[27]  G. Murphy,et al.  Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[29]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[30]  A. Rifkin,et al.  Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Generics and Defaults , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[32]  L. E. Bush Individual differences multidemensional scaling of adjectives denoting feelings. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical methods and scientific inference. , 1957 .

[34]  Ariel Cohen,et al.  On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars , 2001, J. Semant..