Implications of quantum yield differences on the distributions of C3 and C4 grasses

SummaryThe implications of a reduced quantum yield (initial slope of the photosynthetic light response curve) in C4 plants and temperature dependence of quantum yield in C3 plants on total canopy primary production were investigated using computer simulations. Since reduced quantum yield represents the only known disadvantage of the C4 photosynthetic pathway, simulations were conducted with grass canopies (high LAI and hence photosynthesis in most leaves will be light-limited) to see if quantum yield is a significant factor in limiting the primary production and thus distributions of C4 grasses. Simulations were performed for three biogeographical or environmental conditions: the Great Plains region of North America, the Sonoran Desert of North America, and shade habitats. For all three cases, the simulations predicted either spatial or temporal gradients in the abundances of C4 grasses identical to the abundance patterns of C4 grasses observed in the field. It is thus concluded that while the C4 photosynthetic mechanism may be highly advantageous in specific environments, it may be disadvantageous in others.

[1]  S. N. Stephenson,et al.  Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran Desert , 1951 .

[2]  Margaret C. Anderson Stand Structure and Light Penetration. II. A Theoretical Analysis , 1966 .

[3]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO2, and O2 Concentration , 1977 .

[4]  H. Mooney,et al.  Leaf Pubescence: Effects on Absorptance and Photosynthesis in a Desert Shrub , 1976, Science.

[5]  P. Chartier,et al.  Resistance for carbon dioxide diffusion and for carboxylation as factors in bean leaf photosynthesis. , 1970 .

[6]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Quantum Yields for CO(2) Uptake in C(3) and C(4) Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO(2), and O(2) Concentration. , 1977, Plant physiology.

[7]  H. Mooney,et al.  High Photosynthetic Capacity of a Winter Annual in Death Valley , 1976, Science.

[8]  C. Black Ecological Implications of dividing Plants into Groups with Distinct Photosynthetic Production Capacities , 1971 .

[9]  C. E. Hartt,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Fixation in Sugarcane Leaves. , 1965, Plant physiology.

[10]  I. Zelitch Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and plant productivity , 1971 .

[11]  F. Shreve,et al.  Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran desert. Vols 1 and 2. , 1964 .

[12]  R. W. Pearcy C(4) photosynthesis in tree form euphorbia species from hawaiian rainforest sites. , 1975, Plant physiology.

[13]  P. Rundel,et al.  Annual Plants: Adaptations to Desert Environments , 1977 .

[14]  W. D. Sellers,et al.  Arizona climate, 1931-1972 , 1975 .

[15]  M. D. Hatch,et al.  Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. , 1966, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  M. Monsi Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[17]  O. Bjorkman Quantum Yields for CO 2 Uptake in C 3 and C 4 Plants DEPENDENCE ON TEMPERATURE , C 02 , AND 02 CONCENTRATION ' , 2022 .

[18]  R. K. Scott,et al.  Barley and its Environment. III. Carbon Budget of the Stand , 1975 .

[19]  P. Miller,et al.  BIOCLIMATE, LEAF TEMPERATURE, AND PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN RED MANGROVE CANOPIES IN SOUTH FLORIDA' , 1972 .

[20]  Clanton C. Black,et al.  Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation in Relation to Net CO2 Uptake , 1973 .

[21]  J. A. Teeri,et al.  Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America , 1976, Oecologia.

[22]  O. Björkman,et al.  Comparative studies on photosynthesis in higher plants. , 1973, Photophysiology.