My Baby's Movements: An assessment of the effectiveness of the My Baby's Movements phone program in reducing late-gestation stillbirth rates.

BACKGROUND Delayed reporting of decreased fetal movements (DFM) could represent a missed opportunity to prevent stillbirth. Mobile phone applications (apps) have the potential to improve maternal awareness and reporting of DFM and contribute to stillbirth prevention. AIMS To evaluate the effectiveness of the My Baby's Movements (MBM) app on late-gestation stillbirth rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS The MBM trial evaluated a multifaceted fetal movements awareness package across 26 maternity services in Australia and New Zealand between 2016 and 2019. In this secondary analysis, generalised linear mixed models were used to compare rates of late-gestation stillbirth, obstetric interventions, and neonatal outcomes between app users and non-app users including calendar time, cluster, primiparity and other potential confounders as fixed effects, and hospital as a random effect. RESULTS Of 140 052 women included, app users comprised 9.8% (n = 13 780). The stillbirth rate was not significantly lower among app users (1.67/1000 vs 2.29/1000) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.51-1.23). App users were less likely to have a preterm birth (aOR 0.81; 0.75-0.88) or a composite adverse neonatal outcome (aOR 0.87; 0.81-0.93); however, they had higher rates of induction of labour (IOL) (aOR 1.27; 1.22-1.32) and early term birth (aOR 1.08; 1.04-1.12). CONCLUSIONS The MBM app had low uptake and its use was not associated with stillbirth rates but was associated with some neonatal benefit, and higher rates of IOL and early term birth. Use and acceptability of tools designed to promote fetal movement awareness is an important knowledge gap. The implications of increased IOL and early term births warrant consideration in future studies.

[1]  D. Ellwood,et al.  My Baby’s Movements: a stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomised controlled trial of a fetal movement awareness intervention to reduce stillbirths , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  C. Homer,et al.  Mobile Phone Apps in Australia for Improving Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Search on App Stores , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[3]  G. Steineck,et al.  Mindfetalness to increase women’s awareness of fetal movements and pregnancy outcomes: a cluster‐randomised controlled trial including 39 865 women , 2020, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  K. Yatsuki,et al.  Counting fetal movements of small-for-gestational infants using a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder , 2020, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  Frances M. Boyle,et al.  Mobile applications providing guidance about decreased fetal movement: Review and content analysis. , 2019, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[6]  Jessica A. Chen,et al.  Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review , 2019, AMIA.

[7]  D. Ellwood,et al.  Care of pregnant women with decreased fetal movements: Update of a clinical practice guideline for Australia and New Zealand , 2018, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[8]  I. Rådestad,et al.  Women’s attitudes, experiences and compliance concerning the use of Mindfetalness- a method for systematic observation of fetal movements in late pregnancy , 2017, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[9]  I. Rådestad,et al.  "Better safe than sorry"-Reasons for consulting care due to decreased fetal movements. , 2017, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[10]  A. S. Stephens,et al.  Association of Gestational Age and Severe Neonatal Morbidity with Mortality in Early Childhood. , 2016, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[11]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  An Australian survey of women's use of pregnancy and parenting apps. , 2016, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[12]  S. Meaney,et al.  Perinatal outcomes of reduced fetal movements: a cohort study , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[13]  A. Doster,et al.  Pregnancy eHealth and mHealth: user proportions and characteristics of pregnant women using Web-based information sources—a cross-sectional study , 2016, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  T. Kucukozkan,et al.  Chocolate or orange juice for non-reactive non-stress test (NST) patterns: a randomized prospective controlled study , 2013, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[15]  Tigest Tamrat,et al.  Special Delivery: An Analysis of mHealth in Maternal and Newborn Health Programs and Their Outcomes Around the World , 2012, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[16]  Babill Stray-Pedersen,et al.  Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement , 2009, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[17]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  R. Smyth,et al.  Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.