Toolbox talks to prevent construction fatalities: Empirical development and evaluation

Abstract Three studies were conducted to develop and evaluate safety toolbox talks about fatal construction incidents. Study 1 surveyed workers ( n  = 28) about existing pre-shift meetings. An evidence-based structure for toolbox talks was developed, and study 2 evaluated our selected line drawing illustration format with workers ( n  = 30). Study 3 evaluated supervisors’ talks using: (1) new toolbox guides and (2) long-form investigation reports with workers from eight construction crews. In study 1, 25% of the sample reported never conducted safety meetings. In study 2, compared to photos, line drawings increased the distance workers’ could correctly identify hazards by over 1.5 m. In study 3, the new format was preferred by 82% of supervisors, saved them 15 min preparation/presentation time, and produced favorable impacts with workers. Brief scripted toolbox talks made it easier for supervisors to share fatal stories and prevention recommendations with their crews. When the format includes scripted text for the supervisors, prompts for discussion and action items, and line drawings worker understanding can be enhanced.

[1]  Matthew A Forck ISMAs (involved safety meeting activities). , 2005, Occupational health & safety.

[2]  Dov Zohar,et al.  Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[3]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Diffusion of Safety Innovations in the Construction Industry , 2012 .

[4]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  The 'rain dance' of selection in construction: rationality as ritual and the logic of informality , 2007 .

[5]  Philip Bigelow,et al.  Spreading good ideas: a case study of the adoption of an innovation in the construction sector. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Tonya L Smith-Jackson,et al.  Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  A. Koskenvesa,et al.  An Examination of Safety Meetings on Construction Sites , 2012 .

[8]  David Harrington,et al.  Conducting Effective Tailgate Trainings , 2009, Health promotion practice.

[9]  Ann Marie Dale,et al.  Fall prevention and safety communication training for foremen: report of a pilot project designed to improve residential construction safety. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[10]  S. Clarke The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. , 2006, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[11]  Marion Gillen,et al.  Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[12]  Winston Bennett,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA , 1997 .

[13]  Cade McCall,et al.  Construction managers' perceptions of construction safety practices in small and large firms: a qualitative investigation. , 2004, Work.

[14]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Construction-Safety Best Practices and Relationships to Safety Performance , 2013 .

[15]  Mike Williamsen Getting results from safety meetings. Try the 'POP' model to make your sessions productive. , 2003, Occupational health & safety.

[16]  Thomas Mills,et al.  Work safety climate and safety practices among immigrant Latino residential construction workers. , 2012, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  G. L. Mowrey,et al.  Blasting injuries in surface mining with emphasis on flyrock and blast area security. , 2004, Journal of Safety Research.

[18]  Yu-Hsiu Hung,et al.  Use of attitude congruence to identify safety interventions for small residential builders , 2011 .

[19]  Gil Luria,et al.  The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: a cross-level intervention model. , 2003, Journal of safety research.