Dynamic visual tests to identify and quantify visual damage and repair following demyelination in optic neuritis patients.

In order to follow optic neuritis patients and evaluate the effectiveness of their treatment, a handy, accurate and quantifiable tool is required to assess changes in myelination at the central nervous system (CNS). However, standard measurements, including routine visual tests and MRI scans, are not sensitive enough for this purpose. We present two visual tests addressing dynamic monocular and binocular functions which may closely associate with the extent of myelination along visual pathways. These include Object From Motion (OFM) extraction and Time-constrained stereo protocols. In the OFM test, an array of dots compose an object, by moving the dots within the image rightward while moving the dots outside the image leftward or vice versa. The dot pattern generates a camouflaged object that cannot be detected when the dots are stationary or moving as a whole. Importantly, object recognition is critically dependent on motion perception. In the Time-constrained Stereo protocol, spatially disparate images are presented for a limited length of time, challenging binocular 3-dimensional integration in time. Both tests are appropriate for clinical usage and provide a simple, yet powerful, way to identify and quantify processes of demyelination and remyelination along visual pathways. These protocols may be efficient to diagnose and follow optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis patients. In the diagnostic process, these protocols may reveal visual deficits that cannot be identified via current standard visual measurements. Moreover, these protocols sensitively identify the basis of the currently unexplained continued visual complaints of patients following recovery of visual acuity. In the longitudinal follow up course, the protocols can be used as a sensitive marker of demyelinating and remyelinating processes along time. These protocols may therefore be used to evaluate the efficacy of current and evolving therapeutic strategies, targeting myelination of the CNS.

[1]  N. Raz,et al.  Temporal reorganization to overcome monocular demyelination , 2013, Neurology.

[2]  C. Pfueller,et al.  Time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a comparative cross-sectional study , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[3]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001 .

[4]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Ganglion cell loss in relation to visual disability in multiple sclerosis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[5]  V. Wee Yong,et al.  Remyelination Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, Neurotherapeutics.

[6]  M. Maguire,et al.  Validation and test characteristics of a 10-item neuro-ophthalmic supplement to the NEI-VFQ-25. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  W. Mcdonald,et al.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. , 1972, Lancet.

[8]  Sven Schippling,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thinning in clinically isolated syndrome , 2013, Multiple sclerosis.

[9]  C. Pfueller,et al.  Association of Retinal and Macular Damage with Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  R. Kardon,et al.  Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography , 2006 .

[11]  D. Miller,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group. Management of Acute Optic Neuritis , 2022 .

[12]  S. A. Meyer,et al.  Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness , 2011, Multiple sclerosis.

[13]  Steve J Jones,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for long-term repair of MS lesions: implications for axon protection , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  W. Hodge,et al.  Tracking retinal nerve fiber layer loss after optic neuritis: a prospective study using optical coherence tomography , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[15]  F. Paul,et al.  Optic neuritis interferes with optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correlations , 2013, Multiple sclerosis.

[16]  W. Mcdonald,et al.  Delayed pattern-evoked responses in optic neuritis in relation to visual acuity. , 1973, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[17]  P. Albrecht,et al.  Degeneration of retinal layers in multiple sclerosis subtypes quantified by optical coherence tomography , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[18]  Christoph Kniestedt,et al.  Visual acuity and its measurement. , 2003, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[19]  G. Comi,et al.  Axonal injury in early multiple sclerosis is irreversible and independent of the short-term disease evolution , 2005, Neurology.

[20]  N. Raz,et al.  Demyelination affects temporal aspects of perception: An optic neuritis study , 2012, Annals of neurology.

[21]  L. Wrabetz,et al.  Signals to promote myelin formation and repair , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[22]  C. Polman,et al.  Clinico-pathological evidence that axonal loss underlies disability in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[23]  N. Raz,et al.  Sustained motion perception deficit following optic neuritis , 2011, Neurology.