Traitement de l'électromyogramme utérin pour la caractérisation des contractions pendant la grossesse

abstract The uterine electrohysterogram (EWG) has been recorded on the abdomen of pregnant women, from 19 to 37 weeks of gestation (WG), and processed in order to detect preterm delivery. The EHG being corrupted by different electromagnetic noises, we have developed specific algorithms, based on wavelet decomposition, for the denoising of the EHG. Classical parameters, extracted from the spectral and temporal representations and from the instantaneous frequency of the EHG, have permitted us to follow the solution of the signals during pregnancy, Furthermore, a discriminant analysis permitted us to evidence a difference between contractions leading to term or preterm deliveries, as soon as 30 WG Non-stationary parameters have then been computed from EHG signals, in order to follow the two electrical waves that are known on animal recordings to be related to contraction efficiency. The extraction and characterization of these waves are made by extracting the ridges of the scalogram, computed from the continuous wavelet transform. The instrumental part development has started with the analysis of maternal movement artifacts, and with the comparison of different kinds of electrodes, suitable for 24 hours recording. A first portable recorder prototype is presently under development.

[1]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  C. Marque,et al.  Denoising of the uterine EHG by an undecimated wavelet transform , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  C Marque,et al.  Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report. , 1993, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[5]  J. Morrison,et al.  Preterm birth: A puzzle worth solving , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  R. M. Maiden,et al.  The electrical potentials of the human uterus in labor. , 1946, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  L. Duchene,et al.  An Optimal Transformation for Discriminant and Principal Component Analysis , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Asymptotic wavelet and Gabor analysis: Extraction of instantaneous frequencies , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  M. Nageotte,et al.  Quantitation of uterine activity preceding preterm, term, and postterm labor. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Bruno Torrésani,et al.  Multiridge detection and time-frequency reconstruction , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  H. Jakubowicz,et al.  Vaginal Candidiasis: New method of diagnosis and treatment , 1955, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  G J HERTSCH,et al.  Electrical activity of the human uterus in labor; the electrohysterograph. , 1950, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Wavelet Threshold Estimators for Data with Correlated Noise , 1997 .

[15]  R. Newman,et al.  Assessment of uterine activity in ambulatory patients at high risk of preterm labor and delivery. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  C Sureau,et al.  Electrical activity of the pregnant uterus in the cynomolgus monkey. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Uterine EHG Processing for Obstetrical Monitorng , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R. Newman,et al.  Maternal Perception of Prelabor Uterine Activity , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal denoising in an orthonormal basis chosen from a library of bases , 1994 .

[20]  E. Hon,et al.  Cutaneous and uterine electrical potentials in labor; an experiment. , 1958, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Surveillance des grossesses à risque par électromyographie utérine , 1995 .

[22]  C. Pauerstein,et al.  Do tocolytic agents stop preterm labor? A critical and comprehensive review of efficacy and safety. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Bruno Torrésani,et al.  Analyse continue par ondelettes , 1995 .

[24]  M Katz,et al.  Anteparturn Arnbulatorv Tocodvnamometry: The Significance of Low‐Amplitude, High‐Frequency Contractions , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  A real-time algorithm for signal analysis with the help of the wavelet transform , 1989 .

[26]  Ph. Tchamitchian,et al.  Wavelets: Time-Frequency Methods and Phase Space , 1992 .

[27]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[28]  P. Nathanielsz,et al.  Electromyographic activity of the nonpregnant and pregnant sheep uterus. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  A. Germain,et al.  Physiology of uterine activity in pregnancy , 1993, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[30]  G. Wolfs,et al.  Electromyographic Observations on the Human Uterus during Labour , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[31]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[32]  V. Zahn Uterine contractions during pregnancy. , 1984, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[33]  A. Grossmann,et al.  DECOMPOSITION OF HARDY FUNCTIONS INTO SQUARE INTEGRABLE WAVELETS OF CONSTANT SHAPE , 1984 .

[34]  Bernard Rouge,et al.  Restauration d'images par paquets d'ondelettes , 1997 .