Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] ● Pytorch,et al. Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[3] Antje Ihlefeld,et al. Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] G. Kidd,et al. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] R L Freyman,et al. Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Kathryn Hoberg Arehart,et al. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[7] David J. Madden,et al. Adult age differences in attentional selectivity and capacity , 1990 .
[8] P. Baltes,et al. Memorizing while walking: increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. , 2000, Psychology and aging.
[9] A. Duquesnoy. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] N. Cowan,et al. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[11] A Wingfield,et al. One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.
[12] T W Tillman,et al. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.
[13] D. Madden,et al. Adult age differences in strategic and dynamic components of focusing visual attention. , 1997 .
[14] M. Ericson,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] D. Massaro,et al. Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.
[16] Frederick J. Gallun,et al. Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.
[17] Marie Rivenez,et al. Processing unattended speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[19] C L Mackersie,et al. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[20] Virginia Best,et al. The influence of spatial separation on divided listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] R L Freyman,et al. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Michael A Akeroyd,et al. Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] E. Vogel,et al. Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[25] Paul Atchley,et al. Aging and visual masking: sensory and attentional factors. , 2004, Psychology and aging.
[26] Richard L Freyman,et al. Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[28] Liang Li,et al. Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] C. Mckenzie,et al. Attentional and perceptual contributions to the identification of extrafoveal stimuli: adult age comparisons. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.
[30] D. Somers,et al. Processing Efficiency of Divided Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[31] Karen S Helfer,et al. Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[32] Michael A Akeroyd,et al. The Effects of Cueing Temporal and Spatial Attention on Word Recognition in a Complex Listening Task in Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[33] R E Wright,et al. Aging, divided attention, and processing capacity. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.
[34] C. Eriksen,et al. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[35] B. Shinn-Cunningham. Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[36] Claude Alain,et al. Sequential auditory scene analysis is preserved in normal aging adults. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.
[37] A. Wingfield,et al. Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.
[38] Richard L Freyman,et al. Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking , 2007, Ear and hearing.
[39] Rufin VanRullen,et al. Attentional selection of noncontiguous locations: the spotlight is only transiently "split". , 2009, Journal of vision.
[40] A. Treisman. Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .
[41] Daniel Gopher,et al. On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .
[42] B C Moore,et al. Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] J. Kray. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults , 2006, Brain Research.
[44] M. Pichora-Fuller,et al. Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[45] Gerald Kidd,et al. The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[47] A. Wingfield,et al. Does dividing attention become harder with age? findings from the divided attention questionnaire , 1995 .
[48] M R Leek,et al. FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[49] Bruce A. Schneider,et al. The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002 .
[51] Claude Alain,et al. Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location , 2002, Neuroreport.
[52] L. Nyberg,et al. Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory. , 1997, Experimental aging research.
[53] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002, Psychology and aging.
[54] E. C. Cmm,et al. on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .
[55] R. Zatorre,et al. Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[56] Richard L Freyman,et al. Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[57] Bruce A Schneider,et al. Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? , 2006, Psychology and aging.
[58] Morris Moscovitch,et al. Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[59] A Quentin Summerfield,et al. Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] Frederick J. Gallun,et al. The advantage of knowing where to listen. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[61] T. Salthouse. A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .
[62] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[63] D. Alais,et al. Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: Evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[64] F. Craik,et al. Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .
[65] J. Cerella,et al. Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[66] C Alain,et al. Aging and the segregation of auditory stimulus sequences. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.
[67] Jae Hee Lee,et al. Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.