Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Older individuals often report difficulty coping in situations with multiple conversations in which they at times need to "tune out" the background speech and at other times seek to monitor competing messages. The present study was designed to simulate this type of interaction by examining the cost of requiring listeners to perform a secondary task in conjunction with understanding a target talker in the presence of competing speech. The ability of younger and older adults to understand a target utterance was measured with and without requiring the listener to also determine how many masking voices were presented time-reversed. Also of interest was how spatial separation affected the ability to perform these two tasks. Older adults demonstrated slightly reduced overall speech recognition and obtained less spatial release from masking, as compared to younger listeners. For both younger and older listeners, spatial separation increased the costs associated with performing both tasks together. The meaningfulness of the masker had a greater detrimental effect on speech understanding for older participants than for younger participants. However, the results suggest that the problems experienced by older adults in complex listening situations are not necessarily due to a deficit in the ability to switch and/or divide attention among talkers.

[1]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Antje Ihlefeld,et al.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Kathryn Hoberg Arehart,et al.  Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  David J. Madden,et al.  Adult age differences in attentional selectivity and capacity , 1990 .

[8]  P. Baltes,et al.  Memorizing while walking: increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[9]  A. Duquesnoy Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  N. Cowan,et al.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  A Wingfield,et al.  One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[12]  T W Tillman,et al.  Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.

[13]  D. Madden,et al.  Adult age differences in strategic and dynamic components of focusing visual attention. , 1997 .

[14]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. Massaro,et al.  Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Marie Rivenez,et al.  Processing unattended speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  C L Mackersie,et al.  The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  Virginia Best,et al.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Michael A Akeroyd,et al.  Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  E. Vogel,et al.  Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Paul Atchley,et al.  Aging and visual masking: sensory and attentional factors. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[26]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  Liang Li,et al.  Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  C. Mckenzie,et al.  Attentional and perceptual contributions to the identification of extrafoveal stimuli: adult age comparisons. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[30]  D. Somers,et al.  Processing Efficiency of Divided Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Karen S Helfer,et al.  Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[32]  Michael A Akeroyd,et al.  The Effects of Cueing Temporal and Spatial Attention on Word Recognition in a Complex Listening Task in Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[33]  R E Wright,et al.  Aging, divided attention, and processing capacity. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[34]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  B. Shinn-Cunningham Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Claude Alain,et al.  Sequential auditory scene analysis is preserved in normal aging adults. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[38]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[39]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Attentional selection of noncontiguous locations: the spotlight is only transiently "split". , 2009, Journal of vision.

[40]  A. Treisman Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[41]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[42]  B C Moore,et al.  Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  J. Kray Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults , 2006, Brain Research.

[44]  M. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[45]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[47]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Does dividing attention become harder with age? findings from the divided attention questionnaire , 1995 .

[48]  M R Leek,et al.  FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[49]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002 .

[51]  Claude Alain,et al.  Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location , 2002, Neuroreport.

[52]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory. , 1997, Experimental aging research.

[53]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[54]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[55]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Bruce A Schneider,et al.  Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[58]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  A Quentin Summerfield,et al.  Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  The advantage of knowing where to listen. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  T. Salthouse A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .

[62]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  D. Alais,et al.  Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: Evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[64]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .

[65]  J. Cerella,et al.  Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[66]  C Alain,et al.  Aging and the segregation of auditory stimulus sequences. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[67]  Jae Hee Lee,et al.  Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.