Fostering Empathy in an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Course

Engineers are increasingly being called upon to infuse a deeply considered, empathic regard for a broad range of stakeholders into their work. This development can be attributed to a growing recognition of the socially-situated nature of engineering practice and the shared and interdisciplinary nature of today’s grand challenges. In order to prepare engineers to more effectively address these challenges, we contend that empathic ways of interacting with others need to be explicitly fostered in undergraduate engineering programs. Pedagogical approaches to teach empathy to engineering students, however, are limited. In this paper, we describe the development and pilot implementation of a set of four empathy modules that we integrated into a sophomore mechanical engineering course (n=110) at a large state university. We used a theoretically-grounded, context-specific model for empathy in engineering, which conceptualizes empathy as a teachable and learnable skill, a critically reflected-upon practice orientation, and a professional way of being, as the basis for developing the modules. Drawing on detailed observation notes and critical reflections, we provide an account of how the modules were received by the students and the lessons we learned with the view to further refining the modules for future iterations. In parallel, we discuss early insights concerning the potential impact of integrating explicit instruction in empathy into undergraduate education on the professional formation of engineers.

[1]  Shari E. Miller,et al.  Exploring the role of empathy in engineering communication through a transdisciplinary dialogue , 2012 .

[2]  Joachim Walther,et al.  Stories ‘Told’ about engineering in the Media: Implications for attracting diverse groups to the profession , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[3]  Shari E. Miller,et al.  A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being , 2017 .

[4]  Carroll Pursell,et al.  Beyond Engineering: How Society Shapes Technology , 1999 .

[5]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems , 2006 .

[6]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World , 2011 .

[7]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[8]  Andrew McLaughlin The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology , 1987 .

[9]  James Trevelyan,et al.  Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice , 2007 .

[10]  D. Bornstein Response to Review of How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas , 2004, Children, Youth and Environments.

[11]  Ruth Graham,et al.  The One Less Traveled By: The Road to Lasting Systemic Change in Engineering Education , 2012 .

[12]  Ervin Laszlo,et al.  The Systems View of the World: A Holistic Vision for Our Time , 1996 .

[13]  Nadia Kellam,et al.  Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students' Professional Formation , 2011 .

[14]  Jean Decety,et al.  The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: implications for intervention across different clinical conditions , 2007, BioPsychoSocial medicine.

[15]  Peter Robbins,et al.  The reflexive engineer: perceptions of integrated development , 2007 .

[16]  M. Braungart,et al.  The Upcycle: Beyond Sustainability--Designing for Abundance , 2013 .

[17]  Michael J. Rabins,et al.  Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases , 1999 .

[18]  Morgan M. Hynes,et al.  The people part of engineering: Engineering for, with, and as people , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[19]  Caroline Whitbeck,et al.  Ethics in engineering practice and research , 1998 .

[20]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[21]  W. Vanderburg,et al.  How Well Is Engineering Education Incorporating Societal Issues , 1994 .

[22]  Alice L. Pawley,et al.  Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define “Engineering” , 2009 .

[23]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Can Instruction in Engineering Ethics Change Students’ Feelings about Professional Responsibility? , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[24]  E. Segal,et al.  Social Empathy: A Model Built on Empathy, Contextual Understanding, and Social Responsibility That Promotes Social Justice , 2011 .

[25]  Jan Hadlow,et al.  Role-play in social work education: Process and framework for a constructive and focused approach , 1997 .

[26]  Rui Pan,et al.  Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers , 2013 .

[27]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Engaging and Supporting Problem Solving in Engineering Ethics , 2009 .

[28]  Joachim Walther,et al.  Into the Pipeline: A freshman student's experiences of stories told about en- gineering , 2015 .

[29]  R. Levenson,et al.  Empathy: a physiological substrate. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.