Predicting perturbation effects from resting state activity using functional causal flow

Targeted manipulation of neural activity will be greatly facilitated by understanding causal interactions within neural ensembles. Here, we introduce a novel statistical method to infer a network’s “functional causal flow” (FCF) from ensemble neural recordings. Using ground truth data from models of cortical circuits, we show that FCF captures functional hierarchies in the ensemble and reliably predicts the effects of perturbing individual neurons or neural clusters. Critically, FCF is robust to noise and can be inferred from the activity of even a small fraction of neurons in the circuit. It thereby permits accurate prediction of circuit perturbation effects with existing recording technologies for the primate brain. We confirm this prediction by recording changes in the prefrontal ensemble spiking activity of alert monkeys in response to single-electrode microstimulation. Our results provide a foundation for using targeted circuit manipulations to develop new brain-machine interfaces or ameliorate cognitive dysfunctions in the human brain. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this this version posted November 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.23.394916 doi: bioRxiv preprint

[1]  P. Heggelund,et al.  Response variability and orientation discrimination of single cells in striate cortex of cat , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Sequential structure of neocortical spontaneous activity in vivo , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[4]  Yun Wang,et al.  Hierarchical organization of cortical and thalamic connectivity , 2019, Nature.

[5]  A. Thomson,et al.  Functional Maps of Neocortical Local Circuitry , 2007, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[7]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  THE VARIABILITY OF CENTRAL NEURAL ACTIVITY IN A SENSORY SYSTEM, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CENTRAL REFLECTION OF SENSORY EVENTS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  The effect of face patch microstimulation on perception of faces and objects , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Neural Network Mechanisms Underlying Stimulus Driven Variability Reduction , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  R. Douglas,et al.  A Quantitative Map of the Circuit of Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Toru Yanagawa,et al.  Untangling Brain-Wide Dynamics in Consciousness by Cross-Embedding , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  R. Kiani,et al.  Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Confounding Effects of Phase Delays on Causality Estimation , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Learning probabilistic neural representations with randomly connected circuits , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Hirokazu Takahashi,et al.  Locally embedded presages of global network bursts , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[19]  David G Wyrick,et al.  State-dependent control of cortical processing speed via gain modulation , 2020, 2004.04190.

[20]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Diverse coupling of neurons to populations in sensory cortex , 2015, Nature.

[21]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  P. Boon,et al.  Electrical brain stimulation in epilepsy , 2013, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  L Mazzucato,et al.  Expectation-induced modulation of metastable activity underlies faster coding of sensory stimuli , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[26]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Quasi-experimental causality in neuroscience and behavioural research , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[28]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[29]  Tatiana A. Engel,et al.  Selective modulation of cortical state during spatial attention , 2016, Science.

[30]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Coherent neuronal ensembles are rapidly recruited when making a look-reach decision , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[32]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Twin surrogates to test for complex synchronisation , 2006 .

[33]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Effects of Cortical Microstimulation on Confidence in a Perceptual Decision , 2014, Neuron.

[34]  George Sugihara,et al.  Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems , 2012, Science.

[35]  L. Faes,et al.  Information-based detection of nonlinear Granger causality in multivariate processes via a nonuniform embedding technique. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  D. Katz,et al.  Behavioral states, network states, and sensory response variability. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  George Sugihara,et al.  Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series , 1990, Nature.

[38]  A. Litwin-Kumar,et al.  Slow dynamics and high variability in balanced cortical networks with clustered connections , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Source (or Part of the following Source): Type Article Title Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (v1) Predicts Figure Ground Perception Author(s) Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (v1) Predicts Figure–ground Perception Materials and Methods , 2022 .

[40]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Weliky,et al.  Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision , 2004, Nature.

[42]  G. La Camera,et al.  Stimuli Reduce the Dimensionality of Cortical Activity , 2015, bioRxiv.

[43]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity , 2019, Science.

[44]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[45]  G. Orban,et al.  The response variability of striate cortical neurons in the behaving monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Modeling the Impact of Common Noise Inputs on the Network Activity of Retinal Ganglion Cells Action Editor: Brent Doiron , 2022 .

[47]  Amy M. Ni,et al.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.

[48]  Abhranil Das,et al.  Systematic errors in connectivity inferred from activity in strongly recurrent networks , 2020, Nature neuroscience.

[49]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations , 2014, Nature.

[50]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Ising models for networks of real neurons , 2006, q-bio/0611072.

[51]  C. Petersen,et al.  The Excitatory Neuronal Network of the C2 Barrel Column in Mouse Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[52]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[53]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of Human Fusiform Face-Selective Regions Distorts Face Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Sen Song,et al.  Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2005, PLoS biology.

[55]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Accurate Estimation of Neural Population Dynamics without Spike Sorting , 2017, Neuron.

[56]  Maria C. Dadarlat,et al.  Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1 , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Attention stabilizes the shared gain of V4 populations , 2015, eLife.

[58]  Tim Sauer,et al.  Interspike interval embedding of chaotic signals. , 1995, Chaos.

[59]  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen,et al.  A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[60]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Attentional modulation of neuronal variability in circuit models of cortex , 2017, eLife.

[61]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Pyramidal Cell-Interneuron Circuit Architecture and Dynamics in Hippocampal Networks , 2017, Neuron.

[62]  M. Nicolelis,et al.  Global Forebrain Dynamics Predict Rat Behavioral States and Their Transitions , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[64]  T. M. Mayhew,et al.  Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry. , 1991 .

[65]  Christopher J. Cueva,et al.  Natural Grouping of Neural Responses Reveals Spatially Segregated Clusters in Prearcuate Cortex , 2015, Neuron.

[66]  Tomás Gedeon,et al.  On the Efficacy of State Space Reconstruction Methods in Determining Causality , 2015, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[67]  S. Leibler,et al.  Neuronal couplings between retinal ganglion cells inferred by efficient inverse statistical physics methods , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  József Fiser,et al.  Spontaneous Cortical Activity Reveals Hallmarks of an Optimal Internal Model of the Environment , 2011, Science.

[69]  Christopher J. Cueva,et al.  Dynamics of Neural Population Responses in Prefrontal Cortex Indicate Changes of Mind on Single Trials , 2014, Current Biology.

[70]  Vahid Rostami,et al.  Spiking neural network model of motor cortex with joint excitatory and inhibitory clusters reflects task uncertainty, reaction times, and variability dynamics , 2020 .

[71]  Paul Miller,et al.  Natural stimuli evoke dynamic sequences of states in sensory cortical ensembles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[73]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Circuit Models of Low-Dimensional Shared Variability in Cortical Networks , 2019, Neuron.

[74]  J. D. Farmer,et al.  A Theory of State Space Reconstruction in the Presence of Noise , 1991 .

[75]  G. La Camera,et al.  Dynamics of Multistable States during Ongoing and Evoked Cortical Activity , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  D. McCormick,et al.  Movement and Performance Explain Widespread Cortical Activity in a Visual Detection Task. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[77]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Takens embedding theorems for forced and stochastic systems , 1997 .

[78]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[79]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Waking State: Rapid Variations Modulate Neural and Behavioral Responses , 2015, Neuron.

[80]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Estimating Granger causality from fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[81]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  Brett J. Graham,et al.  Anatomy and function of an excitatory network in the visual cortex , 2016, Nature.

[83]  Mauricio Barahona,et al.  Emergence of Slow-Switching Assemblies in Structured Neuronal Networks , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[84]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Inferring single-trial neural population dynamics using sequential auto-encoders , 2017, Nature Methods.

[85]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Linking spontaneous activity of single cortical neurons and the underlying functional architecture. , 1999, Science.

[86]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes , 2003, Nature.

[87]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Predicting how and when hidden neurons skew measured synaptic interactions , 2017, bioRxiv.

[88]  Thomas K. Berger,et al.  A synaptic organizing principle for cortical neuronal groups , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[89]  Douglas A Ruff,et al.  Attention can increase or decrease spike count correlations between pairs of neurons depending on their role in a task , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[90]  George Sugihara,et al.  Predicting climate effects on Pacific sardine , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[91]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Cortical Areas Interact through a Communication Subspace , 2019, Neuron.

[92]  D. Amit,et al.  Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[93]  Tyrus Berry,et al.  Kalman-Takens filtering in the presence of dynamical noise , 2016 .

[94]  K. Harris,et al.  Spontaneous Events Outline the Realm of Possible Sensory Responses in Neocortical Populations , 2009, Neuron.