Memory for the Functional Characteristics of Climbing Walls: Perceiving Affordances

Abstract In 2 experiments, differences in visual perception of climbing routes (route finding) between 7 expert climbers, 4 novices, and 9 inexperienced participants were studied. In both experiments, participants reproduced on a scale model the locations and orientations of 23 holds of a climbing wall. The results showed that the expert climbers recalled more information and recalled clusters of information and that they focused on the functional aspects of a climbing wall, whereas they neglected its structural features. Inexperienced participants did not recall such clustered information, and they reported almost exclusively the structural features of the holds. The perception of nested affordances and the expert climbers' neglect of details are discussed.

[1]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[2]  J. Sanders.  An Ontology of Affordances , 1997 .

[3]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances and Events , 2000 .

[4]  Philippe Bolon,et al.  Entropy, degrees of freedom, and free climbing: a thermodynamic study of a complex behavior based on trajectory analysis. , 1993 .

[5]  A. D. D. Groot,et al.  Perception and memory in chess: Studies in the heuristics of the prodessional eye , 1996 .

[6]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[7]  G. Ermentrout.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997 .

[8]  J. Vickers,et al.  Visual control when aiming at a far target. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[10]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[11]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  Expert chess memory: revisiting the chunking hypothesis. , 1998, Memory.

[13]  Perceiving Conflicting Affordances , 2019, Studies in Perception and Action III.

[14]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Visual–perceptual and cognitive differences between expert, intermediate, and novice snooker players , 1994 .

[15]  J. Vickers.  Knowledge structures of expert-novice gymnasts ☆ , 1988 .

[16]  P. Beek,et al.  The State of Ecological Psychology , 1995 .

[17]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  J. M. Kennedy,et al.  Fatigue and reachability , 1997 .

[19]  P. A. Beltel.  Multivariate relationships among visual-perceptual attributes and gross-motor tasks with different environmental demands. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  J. R. Barry,et al.  Cognitive advantage in sport: the nature of perceptual structures. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Studying perceptual-motor actions from mutually constraining perspectives , 1998 .

[22]  Didier Delignières,et al.  A psychophysical study of difficulty rating in rock climbing. , 1993 .

[23]  M. Boschker.  Mentale voorstellingen van bewegingen [Review of: (2001) Action-based imagery: On the nature of mentally imagined motor actions] , 2001 .

[24]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  THE MIND'S EYE IN CHESS , 1988 .

[25]  D. Glencross,et al.  Expert perception and decision making in baseball. , 1997 .

[26]  H. Ripoll.  The understanding-acting process in sport: the relationship between the semantic and the sensorimotor visual function. , 1991 .

[27]  Philippe Bolon,et al.  Entropy as a global variable of the learning process , 1994 .