Lack of Objective Measurement in the Initial Screening and Follow-Up of Patients Who Report Whiplash Injury—Is Elastography of the Trapezius Muscle an Answer?

Background: Painfully decreased cervical range of motion accompanied by muscle spasm is a common presentation of whiplash injury of the neck. Stiffness of the cervical muscles can be assessed by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE), expressed in kilopascals (kPa). The hypothesis: SWE of the trapezius muscle is an objective measurement suitable for the initial screening and follow-up of patients who report whiplash injury. Methods and results: A total of 99 patients after whiplash injury were compared to 75 control participants. Mean trapezius stiffness was 82.24 ± 21.11 vs. 57.47 ± 13.82 for whiplash patients and controls, respectively. The cut-off value of SWE of 75.8 kPa showed 77% accuracy in correctly assigning patients to the whiplash or control group. To evaluate whether SWE can be used as a follow-up method of recovery after a whiplash injury, initial and endpoint SWE (after six months, n = 24) was carried out. Patients reporting no recovery showed similar SWE values as completely recovered patients. This finding refutes the second part of our hypothesis. Conclusions: SWE is a method that can be used for the initial screening of patients with whiplash injury, but we are still searching for an objective measurement that can be used in the follow-up of recovery.

[1]  Jure Aljinović,et al.  Neck Disability Index Is Better in Classification of Recovery after Whiplash Injury in Comparison with Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography of Trapezius Muscle , 2021, Diagnostics.

[2]  Jure Aljinović,et al.  Croatian version of the neck disability index can distinguish between acute, chronic and no neck pain , 2021, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[3]  G. Sartori,et al.  The detection of malingering in whiplash-related injuries: a targeted literature review of the available strategies , 2021, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[4]  C. Boese,et al.  Prognostic Value of Age and Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cervical Subaxial Spinal Cord Injuries , 2020, Neurology India.

[5]  Jure Aljinović,et al.  Can measuring passive neck muscle stiffness in whiplash injury patients help detect false whiplash claims? , 2020, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[6]  H. Järnbert-Pettersson,et al.  The significance of cervical sagittal alignment for non-recovery after whiplash injury. , 2020, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  S. Ponzer,et al.  Association between cervical degeneration and self-perceived non-recovery after whiplash injury. , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[8]  V. Johnston,et al.  Impact of interventions on work-related outcomes for individuals with musculoskeletal injuries after road traffic crash: a systematic review protocol , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[9]  R. D. de Bie,et al.  To What Degree Does Active Cervical Range of Motion Differ Between Patients With Neck Pain, Patients With Whiplash, and Those Without Neck Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2017, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Witte,et al.  Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  I. Harris,et al.  Factors predicting outcome in whiplash injury: a systematic meta-review of prognostic factors , 2016, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[12]  M. Curatolo Pharmacological and Interventional Management of Pain After Whiplash Injury. , 2016, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[13]  J. Cassidy,et al.  What Happens When Compensation for Whiplash Claims is Made More Generous? , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  J. Macdermid,et al.  Risk factors for persistent problems following acute whiplash injury: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[15]  D. Soave,et al.  Psychological Factors in the Use of the Neck Disability Index in Chronic Whiplash Patients , 2010, Spine.

[16]  M. Nordin,et al.  The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in Whiplash-Associated Disorders After Traffic Collisions: Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders , 2008, Spine.

[17]  S. Yadla,et al.  Whiplash: diagnosis, treatment, and associated injuries , 2007, Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine.

[18]  R. D. de Bie,et al.  Conservative treatments for whiplash. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  E. Hendriks,et al.  Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies , 2003, Pain.

[20]  W. Spitzer,et al.  Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. , 1995, Spine.