An Integrated Landscape Designed for Commodity and Bioenergy Crops for a Tile-Drained Agricultural Watershed.

Locating bioenergy crops on strategically selected subfield areas of marginal interest for commodity agriculture can increase environmental sustainability. Location and choice of bioenergy crops should improve environmental benefits with minimal disruption of current food production systems. We identified subfield soils of a tile-drained agricultural watershed as marginal if they had areas of low crop productivity index (CPI), were susceptible to nitrate-nitrogen (NO-N) leaching, or were susceptible to at least two other forms of environmental degradation (marginal areas). In the test watershed (Indian Creek watershed, IL) with annual precipitation of 852 mm, 3% of soils were CPI areas and 22% were marginal areas. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool was used to forecast the impact of growing switchgrass ( L.), willow ( spp.), and big bluestem ( Vitman) in these subfield areas on annual grain yields, NO-N and sediment exports, and water yield. Simulated conversion of CPI areas from current land use to bioenergy crops had no significant ( 0.05) impact on grain production and reduced NO-N and sediment exports by 5.0 to 6.0% and 3.0%, respectively. Conversion of marginal areas from current land use to switchgrass forecasted the production of 34,000 t of biomass and reductions in NO-N (26.0%) and sediment (33.0%) exports. Alternatively, conversion of marginal areas from current land use to willow forecasted similar reductions as switchgrass for sediment but significantly ( 0.01) lower reductions in annual NO-N export (18.0 vs. 26.0%).

[1]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[2]  Richard A C Cooke,et al.  Nitrogen balance in and export from agricultural fields associated with controlled drainage systems and denitrifying bioreactors , 2010 .

[3]  Philip W. Gassman,et al.  Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT , 2006 .

[4]  C. Nietch,et al.  Alternative Land-Use Method for Spatially Informed Watershed Management Decision Making Using SWAT , 2013 .

[5]  J. Campbell,et al.  Historical U.S. cropland areas and the potential for bioenergy production on abandoned croplands. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  S. Ogle,et al.  Management swing potential for bioenergy crops , 2013 .

[7]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[8]  Mark D Tomer,et al.  Evaluation of the hooghoudt and kirkham tile drain equations in the soil and water assessment tool to simulate tile flow and nitrate-nitrogen. , 2013, Journal of environmental quality.

[9]  G. McIsaac,et al.  Modeling riverine nitrate export from an East-Central Illinois watershed using SWAT. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[10]  C. Bernacchi,et al.  Reduced nitrogen losses after conversion of row crop agriculture to perennial biofuel crops. , 2013, Journal of environmental quality.

[11]  M. Arabi,et al.  Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT , 2008 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[13]  Donna Heimiller,et al.  Renewable energy potential on marginal lands in the United States , 2014 .

[14]  G. Fu,et al.  Uncertainties in SWAT extreme flow simulation under climate change , 2014 .

[15]  C. Hinrichs,et al.  Hope and skepticism: Farmer and local community views on the socio-economic benefits of agricultural bioenergy , 2011 .

[16]  O. Shortall.  “Marginal land” for energy crops: Exploring definitions and embedded assumptions , 2013 .

[17]  Gayathri Gopalakrishnan,et al.  A novel framework to classify marginal land for sustainable biomass feedstock production. , 2011, Journal of environmental quality.

[18]  G. McIsaac,et al.  Miscanthus and switchgrass production in central Illinois: impacts on hydrology and inorganic nitrogen leaching. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[19]  Cole H Green,et al.  HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR A LARGE TILE-DRAINED WATERSHED IN IOWA , 2006 .

[20]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest , 2013, Nature.

[21]  L. Kurkalova,et al.  Land use change in a biofuels hotspot: The case of Iowa, USA , 2011 .

[22]  F. Below,et al.  Nitrogen mass balance of a tile-drained agricultural watershed in East-Central Illinois. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[23]  Alison Mohr,et al.  Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels☆ , 2013, Energy Policy.

[24]  Ann Peterson,et al.  Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: a review. , 2012 .

[25]  Mark Harvey,et al.  The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change , 2011 .

[26]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  Higher US crop prices trigger little area expansion so marginal land for biofuel crops is limited , 2011 .

[27]  Anna Hart,et al.  Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  N. Fohrer,et al.  How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment – temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance , 2014 .

[29]  Martin Volk,et al.  Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity , 2009 .

[30]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Applications of the SWAT Model Special Section: Overview and Insights. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.

[31]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: parameter development and model improvement , 2015 .

[32]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Importance of Crop Yield in Calibrating Watershed Water Quality Simulation Tools 1 , 2011 .

[33]  André Faaij,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of micro-algae as feedstock for renewable bio-energy production , 2013 .

[34]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[35]  M. Liew,et al.  Assessing climate change impacts on water balance,runoff, and water quality at the field scalefor four locations in the heartland , 2013 .

[36]  Carla S. Jones,et al.  Algae biofuels: versatility for the future of bioenergy. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[37]  Prasanna H. Gowda,et al.  Modeling the impact of nitrogen fertilizer application and tile drain configuration on nitrate leaching using SWAT , 2013 .

[38]  David J. Muth,et al.  Modeled Impacts of Cover Crops and Vegetative Barriers on Corn Stover Availability and Soil Quality , 2014, BioEnergy Research.

[39]  Richard A C Cooke,et al.  Performance of drainage water management systems in Illinois, United States , 2012, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[40]  Dennis R. Helsel,et al.  Risk of Nitrate in Groundwaters of the United StatesA National Perspective , 1997 .

[41]  Charles E. Kellogg,et al.  Soil Survey Manual , 2017 .

[42]  G. McIsaac,et al.  Variation in riverine nitrate flux and fall nitrogen fertilizer application in East-central illinois. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.

[43]  Douglas L. Karlen,et al.  Crop Residue Considerations for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Supplies , 2014, BioEnergy Research.

[44]  Mark D Tomer,et al.  Sediment delivery estimates in water quality models altered by resolution and source of topographic data. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.