Explanatory models for the research & development of chemistry visualizations

[1]  A. diSessa,et al.  What changes in conceptual change , 1998 .

[2]  Guy Ashkenazi.  Similarity and Difference in the Behavior of Gases: An Interactive Demonstration. , 2008 .

[3]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Development and Application of a Diagnostic Instrument to Evaluate Grade-11 and -12 Students' Concepts of Covalent Bonding and Structure Following a Course of Instruction. , 1989 .

[4]  Ellen J. Yezierski,et al.  Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter. Using Animations To Close the Gender Gap , 2006 .

[5]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  D. Gabel,et al.  Understanding the Particulate Nature of Matter. , 1987 .

[7]  Robert F. Tinker,et al.  Applying Computational Science to Education: The Molecular Workbench Paradigm , 2008, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[8]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  Common sense clarified: The role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving , 2006 .

[9]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[10]  Georgios Tsaparlis.  Atomic orbitals, molecular orbitals and related concepts: Conceptual difficulties among chemistry students , 1997 .

[11]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  How Students Understand Physics Equations , 2001 .

[12]  Conceptual Questions and Lack of Formal Reasoning: Are They Mutually Exclusive?. , 2012 .

[13]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[14]  David Hammer,et al.  Misconceptions or P-Prims: How May Alternative Perspectives of Cognitive Structure Influence Instructional Perceptions and Intentions , 1996 .

[15]  A. Özkaya,et al.  Effectiveness of Conceptual Change-Oriented Teaching Strategy To Improve Students' Understanding of Galvanic Cells , 2006 .

[16]  M. Maehr,et al.  Beyond a Two-Goal Theory of Motivation and Achievement: A Case for Social Goals , 1995 .

[17]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[18]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  You Can’t Get There from Here1 , 2010 .

[19]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[20]  A D Baddeley,et al.  Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Children's Ideas About Matter , 1991 .

[22]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Visualization in science education , 2005 .

[23]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Students' Misunderstandings and Misconceptions in College Freshman Chemistry (General and Organic). , 1990 .

[25]  M. Hegarty.  Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[26]  Anil C. Banerjee.  Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. , 1991 .

[27]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[28]  C. L. Habraken.  Perceptions of chemistry: Why is the common perception of chemistry, the most visual of sciences, so distorted? , 1996 .

[29]  M. Stieff.  Improving Representational Competence Using Molecular Simulations Embedded in Inquiry Activities , 2011 .

[30]  A. Paivio.  Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[31]  Conceptual Change, Productive Practices, and Themata: Supporting Chemistry Classroom Talk , 2012 .

[32]  S. Brownlow,et al.  Gender Differences in Spatial Task Performance as a Function of Speed or Accuracy Orientation , 2000 .

[33]  J. Slotta.  In Defense of Chi's Ontological Incompatibility Hypothesis , 2011 .

[34]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[35]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Teaching and Learning with Three-dimensional Representations , 2005 .

[36]  Robert M. Hanson,et al.  Jmol – a paradigm shift in crystallographic visualization , 2010 .

[37]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Connected Chemistry—Incorporating Interactive Simulations into the Chemistry Classroom , 2003 .

[38]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Students Becoming Chemists: Developing Representationl Competence , 2005 .

[39]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[40]  M. Nakhleh.  Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions , 1992 .

[41]  Arlene A. Russell.  Symposium on Systemic Reform in Chemistry , 1997 .

[42]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[43]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[44]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[45]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[46]  Alexandru T. Balaban,et al.  Visual Chemistry: Three-Dimensional Perception of Chemical Structures , 1999 .

[47]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[48]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts , 1997 .

[49]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[50]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Cindy Samet,et al.  CAChe Molecular Modeling: A Visualization Tool Early in the Undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum , 1996 .

[52]  A. Baddeley.  Is working memory still working? , 2001, The American psychologist.

[53]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Learning Processes in Chemistry: Drawing Upon Cognitive Resources to Learn About the Particulate Structure of Matter , 2010 .

[54]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[55]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Repetition and dual coding in procedural multimedia presentations , 2008 .

[56]  S. Carey.  Cognitive science and science education. , 1986 .

[57]  Ayush Gupta,et al.  On Static and Dynamic Intuitive Ontologies , 2011 .

[58]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  THE TROUBLE WITH LEVELS: A REEXAMINATION OF CRAIK AND LOCKHART'S FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH , 1978 .

[59]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[60]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures , 1999 .

[61]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  The Cognitive Revolution at Age 50: Has the Promise of the Human Information-Processing Approach Been Fulfilled? , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..