Life cycle assessment of solid refuse fuel production from MSW in Korea

Solid refuse fuel (SRF) produced from waste materials is a promising fuel that can be utilized for energy recovery in industries. This study considered both characterization and weighting modeling as life cycle assessment (LCA) results. This study aimed to analyze the flows of materials and energy and to evaluate the environmental impact of SRF plants using LCA and compared them with an incineration plant. Based on the results of material and energy flow analysis, SRF products had various energy potentials depending on the treatment method of municipal solid waste (MSW) and replaced the current fossil fuels by SRF combustion. Global impacts were mainly influenced by energy consumption, especially drying methods in the production of SRF, and affected the results of the weighting analysis. The SRF plant with a bio-drying option was evaluated as the best effective practice in the weighting analysis. The LCA results in this study indicated 0.021–9.88 points according to drying methods for SRF production and 1.38 points for incineration. In the sensitivity analysis, the environmental impact of SRF production was found to be significantly affected by the drying methods for MSW and the utilization of fossil energy. Thus, improvement of the drying options could significantly reduce the environmental impact.

[1]  Vladimir Koci,et al.  Mixed municipal waste management in the Czech Republic from the point of view of the LCA method , 2011 .

[2]  A Papageorgiou,et al.  Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Pranee Nutongkaew,et al.  Greenhouse Gases Emission of Refuse Derived Fuel-5 Production from Municipal Waste and Palm Kernel , 2014 .

[4]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[5]  T. Fruergaard.  Environmentally sustainable utilization of waste resources for energy production , 2010 .

[6]  R. Derwent,et al.  Photochemical ozone creation potentials for organic compounds in northwest Europe calculated with a master chemical mechanism , 1998 .

[7]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Energy implications of mechanical and mechanical-biological treatment compared to direct waste-to-energy. , 2013, Waste management.

[8]  S Consonni,et al.  Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste Part A: Mass and energy balances. , 2005, Waste management.

[9]  Garry D. Hayman,et al.  Photochemical ozone creation potentials for oxygenated volatile organic compounds: sensitivity to variations in kinetic and mechanistic parameters , 1999 .

[10]  T Fruergaard,et al.  Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective. , 2011, Waste management.

[11]  M. Huijbregts.  Priority Assessment of Toxic Substances in the frame of LCA. Develpment and application of the multi-media fate, exposure and effedt model USES-LCA. , 1999 .

[12]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[13]  S Consonni,et al.  Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste Part B: Emission and cost estimates. , 2005, Waste management.

[14]  P. Vainikka,et al.  Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 1: SRF produced from commercial and industrial waste. , 2014, Waste management.