Effects of distraction and compression on proliferation of growth plate chondrocytes. A study in rabbits.

An external fixation device was applied across the distal femoral physis in 30 rabbits, and distraction or compression was performed for 3-21 days; either no operation or a sham-operation was performed on the contralateral side. Proliferating cells were labeled with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine, a thymidine analogue, and subsequently localized in decalcified histologic sections using a specific monoclonal antibody. The height of the proliferative and hypertrophic zones was increased after distraction; additionally, fracture-separation through the hypertrophic zone or at the junction of the physis and metaphysis was seen in 13 of the 15 specimens. Labeled cells were encountered only in the proliferative zone in all specimens except after early distraction, where labeled chondrocytes were seen close to the separation gap in the hypertrophic zone, too. Distraction had no effect on the number of labeled cells. A reduction in the height of the proliferative and hypertrophic zones occurred after compression, and the number of proliferating chondrocytes decreased.

[1]  N. Kember Cell Kinetics and the Control of Growth In Long Bones , 1978, Cell and tissue kinetics.

[2]  H. Gratzner,et al.  Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine: A new reagent for detection of DNA replication. , 1982, Science.

[3]  S. L. Haas RETARDATION OF BONE GROWTH BY A WIRE LOOP , 1945 .

[4]  N. Kember,et al.  Control of Bone Growth in Rats , 1971, Nature.

[5]  S. Apte,et al.  Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) immunohistochemistry in undecalcified plastic-embedded tissue. Elimination of the DNA denaturation step , 2004, Histochemistry.

[6]  N. Christensen Growth arrest by stapling. An experimental study of longitudinal bone growth and morphology of the growth region. , 1973, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[7]  J. Katzmann,et al.  S-phase detection with an antibody to bromodeoxyuridine. Role of DNase pretreatment. , 1986, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  J. Cañadell,et al.  Experimental physeal distraction in immature sheep. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  J. Connolly,et al.  Epiphyseal traction to correct acquired growth deformities. An animal and clinical investigation. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  R. Aldegheri,et al.  Limb lengthening by distraction of the epiphyseal plate. A comparison of two techniques in the rabbit. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J. Trueta,et al.  The vascular contribution to osteogenesis. IV. The effect of pressure upon the epiphysial cartilage of the rabbit. , 1961, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  C. Farnum,et al.  Visualization of living terminal hypertrophic chondrocytes of growth plate cartilage in situ by differential interference contrast microscopy and time‐lapse cinematography , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  C. Farquharson,et al.  Cell proliferation within the growth plate of long bones assessed by bromodeoxyuridine uptake and its relationship to glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[14]  S. L. Haas Mechanical retardation of bone growth. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  N. Kember Cell division in endochondral ossification. A study of cell proliferation in rat bones by the method of tritiated thymidine autoradiography. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  W. P. Blount,et al.  Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. , 1949, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  K. Sato,et al.  Regulation of colony formation of differentiated chondrocytes in soft agar by transforming growth factor-beta. , 1989, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  R. Siffert The effect of staples and longitudinal wires on epiphyseal growth; an experimental study. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Giorgio Monticelli,et al.  Limb lengthening by epiphyseal distraction , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[20]  E. Morscher,et al.  The relationship between periosteal division and compression or distraction of the growth plate. An experimental study in the rabbit. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  Limb lengthening by low rate epiphyseal distraction. An experimental study in the caprine tibia , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  S. Apte Application of monoclonal antibody to bromodeoxyuridine to detect chondrocyte proliferation in growth plate cartilage in vivo , 1988 .

[23]  G. Breur,et al.  Linear relationship between the volume of hypertrophic chondrocytes and the rate of longitudinal bone growth in growth plates , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  C. Sledge,et al.  Parameters of longitudinal growth rate in rabbit epiphyseal growth plates. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Physiological mechanisms adopted by chondrocytes in regulating longitudinal bone growth in rats. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  D. Gospodarowicz,et al.  Sulfated proteoglycan synthesis by confluent cultures of rabbit costal chondrocytes grown in the presence of fibroblast growth factor , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.