Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells

During mitosis in cultured newt pneumocytes, one or more chromosomes may become positioned well removed (greater than 50 microns) from the polar regions during early prometaphase. As a result, these chromosomes are delayed for up to 5 h in forming an attachment to the spindle. The spatial separation of these chromosomes from the polar microtubule- nucleating centers provides a unique opportunity to study the initial stages of kinetochore fiber formation in living cells. Time-lapse Nomarski-differential interference contrast videomicroscopic observations reveal that late-attaching chromosomes always move, upon attachment, into a single polar region (usually the one closest to the chromosome). During this attachment, the kinetochore region of the chromosome undergoes a variable number of transient poleward tugs that are followed, shortly thereafter, by rapid movement of the chromosome towards the pole. Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence and serial section EM reveal that the kinetochores and kinetochore regions of nonattached chromosomes lack associated microtubules. By contrast, these methods reveal that the attachment and subsequent poleward movement of a chromosome correlates with the association of a single long microtubule with one of the kinetochores of the chromosome. This microtubule traverses the entire distance between the spindle pole and the kinetochore and often extends well past the kinetochore. From these results, we conclude that the initial attachment of a chromosome to the newt pneumocyte spindle results from an interaction between a single polar-nucleated microtubule and one of the kinetochores on the chromosome. Once this association is established, the kinetochore is rapidly transported poleward along the surface of the microtubule by a mechanism that is not dependent on microtubule depolymerization. Our results further demonstrate that the motors for prometaphase chromosome movement must be either on the surface of the kinetochore (i.e., within the corona but not the plate), distributed along the surface of the kinetochore microtubules, or both.

[1]  H. Lin,et al.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The prometaphase-I kinetochore microtubule bundle and kinetochore orientation in males , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  M. De Brabander,et al.  Nucleated assembly of mitotic microtubules in living PTK2 cells after release from nocodazole treatment. , 1981, Cell motility.

[3]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Mitosis , 1951, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[4]  M. A. Janicke,et al.  Malorientation in half-bivalents at anaphase: analysis of autosomal laggards in untreated, cold-treated, and cold-recovering crane fly spermatocytes , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Rethinking mitosis , 1982, Cell.

[6]  E. Salmon,et al.  Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  H. Lin,et al.  Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  Nicklas Rb Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. , 1967 .

[9]  R. Nicklas,et al.  The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[10]  T. Mitchison Microtubule dynamics and kinetochore function in mitosis. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[11]  C. Rieder,et al.  Mechanically cut mitotic spindles: clean cuts and stable microtubules. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[12]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  A. Bajer Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Y. Hotta,et al.  Cell Division , 2021, Nature.

[15]  L. Goldstein Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division in male D. melanogaster , 1981, Cell.

[16]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro , 1988, Nature.

[17]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle , 1986, Cell.

[19]  R. Vallee,et al.  MAP 1C is a microtubule-activated ATPase which translocates microtubules in vitro and has dynein-like properties , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  C. Rieder The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. , 1982, International review of cytology.

[21]  J R McIntosh,et al.  Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  I R Gibbons,et al.  Dynein ATPases as microtubule motors. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase , 1980, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  S. Inoué Cell division and the mitotic spindle , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  A. Forer Do anaphase chromosomes chew their way to the pole or are they pulled by actin? , 1988, Journal of cell science.

[26]  J. Snyder,et al.  Structure and physiology of the mammalian mitotic spindle. , 1975, Society of General Physiologists series.

[27]  R. Margolis,et al.  Mitotic mechanism based on intrinsic microtubule behaviour , 1978, Nature.

[28]  S Inoué,et al.  Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule ends after ultraviolet- microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Mitosis in Oedogonium: spindle microfilaments and the origin of the kinetochore fiber. , 1980, European journal of cell biology.

[30]  A. Adoutte,et al.  Microtubule dynamics investigated by microinjection of Paramecium axonemal tubulin: lack of nucleation but proximal assembly of microtubules at the kinetochore during prometaphase , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  C. Rieder,et al.  Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  T. L. Hill,et al.  Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly-disassembly. , 1982, International review of cytology.

[33]  R. Vallee,et al.  Retrograde transport by the microtubule-associated protein MAP 1C , 1987, Nature.

[34]  R. Nicklas Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. , 1967, Chromosoma.

[35]  G. Borisy,et al.  Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth , 1984, Nature.

[37]  R. Nicklas Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. I. Microtubule nucleation and tubulin binding , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  B. Brinkley,et al.  Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes. , 1979, Journal of cell science.

[40]  R. Hard,et al.  Newt lung epithelial cells: cultivation, use, and advantages for biomedical research. , 1990, International review of cytology.

[41]  J. Rosenbaum,et al.  Assembly of microtubules onto kinetochores of isolated mitotic chromosomes of HeLa cells. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  C. Rieder,et al.  Biotin-tubulin incorporates into kinetochore fiber microtubules during early but not late anaphase , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  B. Brinkley,et al.  COLD‐LABILE AND COLD‐STABLE MICROTUBULES IN THE MITOTIC SPINDLE OF MAMMALIAN CELLS * , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  J. B. Farmer The Cell in Development and Inheritance , 1901, Nature.

[45]  W. Steffen,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of chromosome fibres in the crane fly: amphitelic autosomal univalents in late prometaphase , 1985 .

[46]  M. Berns,et al.  Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  M. Bastmeyer,et al.  Aster-free spindle poles in insect spermatocytes: evidence for chromosome-induced spindle formation? , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  J. Pickett-Heaps Mitotic mechanisms: an alternative view , 1986 .

[49]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. II. Microtubule capture and ATP- dependent translocation , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  E D Salmon,et al.  Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  R. Nicklas Chromosomes and Kinetochores do More in Mitosis than Previously Thought , 1988 .

[52]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  The diatom spindle in perspective , 1978, Cell.

[53]  J. McIntosh,et al.  STUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF MITOSIS , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[54]  A Leith,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of cells from serial sections and whole-cell mounts using multilevel contouring of stereo micrographs. , 1988, Journal of electron microscopy technique.