Digitally Enabled Social Innovation: A Case Study of Community Empowerment in Rural China

Digitally Enabled Social Innovation (DESI) has generated a variety of important social benefits for communities across the globe. Yet, despite its importance in contemporary society, our review of the literature indicates that the concept has not been studied to a significant degree to date. To address this gap, this study seeks to address the research question: how do communities self-organize to achieve DESI? Based on a pilot case study of Daiji village, one of the most successful Taobao Villages in rural China, a preliminary process model of the attainment of DESI is presented in this research-inprogress paper. More specifically, our pilot study reveals that that the process of achieving DESI is contingent on a mechanism of bricolage, which consists of four steps: Recognition, Preparation, Recombination and Governance. Through the four steps, digital repertoires are formed and enacted for the attainment of DESI.

[1]  D. Sim.  The Rise of the Network Society (The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 1) , 1998 .

[2]  C. B. Bhattacharya.  The Importance of Marketing for Social Innovation , 2013 .

[3]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid: A Recipe for Inclusive Growth or Social Exclusion? , 2012 .

[4]  Gunther Barth,et al.  The Decline of the Californios: A Social History of the Spanish-Speaking Californians, 1846–1890. By Leonard Pitt. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966. x + 324 pp. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, and index. $7.95.) , 1967 .

[5]  Xubei Luo,et al.  Rising Income Inequality in China: A Race to the Top , 2008 .

[6]  Leonard Pitt,et al.  The Decline of the Californios: A Social History of the Spanish-Speaking Californians, 1846-1890 , 1966 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  C. Kieffer.  Citizen empowerment: a developmental perspective. , 1984, Prevention in human services.

[9]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  The Process of Social Innovation , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[10]  Mann Hyung Hur,et al.  Empowerment in Terms of Theoretical Perspectives: Exploring a Typology of the Process and Components across Disciplines. , 2006 .

[11]  E. Malecki.  Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional, and National Change , 1991 .

[12]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Enhancing Social Innovation by Rethinking Collaboration, Leadership and Public Governance , 2013 .

[13]  Frank Pot,et al.  Social innovation, the new challenge for Europe , 2008 .

[14]  Julius J. Okello,et al.  Uses of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Agriculture and Rural Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Experiences from South Africa and Kenya , 2010, Int. J. ICT Res. Dev. Afr..

[15]  JOCELYN WYATT,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation IDEO , 2010 .

[16]  Esen Oruc Buyukbay,et al.  An investigation on computer and internet use for agricultural development in rural areas: A case study for Tokat Province in Turkey , 2011 .

[17]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[18]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Rediscovering Social Innovation , 2008 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[20]  E. Marfo,et al.  Powerful relations: the role of actor-empowerment in the management of natural resource conflicts : a case of forest conflicts in Ghana , 2006 .

[21]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  The dynamics of social innovation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  T. Baker,et al.  Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage , 2005 .

[23]  C. Freeman.  Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems--complementarity and economic growth , 2002 .

[24]  Nanette Page,et al.  Empowerment: What Is It?. , 1999 .

[25]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[26]  J. Rappaport.  Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology , 1987, American journal of community psychology.

[27]  Alex Murdock,et al.  The Nature of Social Innovation , 2012 .

[28]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  The riddle of heterarchy: : power transitions in cross-functional teams , 2014 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  G. Finnerty.  Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers , 2003 .

[31]  R. Kozma.  National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development , 2005 .

[32]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[33]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[34]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour , 2008 .

[35]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[36]  R. Gephart.  Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[37]  Eric M. Eisenberg,et al.  Jamming Transcendence Through Organizing , 1990 .

[38]  George W. Fairweather,et al.  Methods for Experimental Social Innovation. , 1968 .

[39]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[40]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Cultural Impacts on Acceptance and Adoption of Information Technology in a Developing Country , 2010, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[41]  Sara Moridpour,et al.  Identifying crash black spots in Melbourne road network using kernel density estimation in GIS , 2015 .

[42]  Barbara Bryant Solomon,et al.  Black Empowerment: Social Work in Oppressed Communities , 1977 .

[43]  Christopher Bodnar,et al.  Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies , 2000 .

[44]  James Blake.  Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience , 1999 .

[45]  Wei-ping Wu.  Dimensions of Social Capital and Firm Competitiveness Improvement: The Mediating Role of Information Sharing , 2007 .

[46]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[47]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[48]  Simon Ville,et al.  Social innovation: buzz word or enduring term? , 2009 .

[49]  Glenn Laverack,et al.  An identification and interpretation of the organizational aspects of community empowerment , 2001 .

[50]  A. D’augelli,et al.  Gay women, men, and families in rural settings: Toward the development of helping communities , 1987, American journal of community psychology.

[51]  M. McElroy.  Social innovation capital , 2002 .

[52]  Steven Dhondt,et al.  Workplace innovation, social innovation and social quality , 2011 .

[53]  Isabel Breda-Vázquez,et al.  Creativity and Social Innovation: What Can Urban Policies Learn from Sectoral Experiences? , 2012 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[55]  Mathias Hatakka,et al.  Capability Outcomes from Educational and ICT Capability Inputs – An Analysis of ICT use in Informal Education in Kenya , 2014, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[56]  A. Nicholls,et al.  Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets , 2012 .

[57]  Gail A. Mountain,et al.  New forms of information and communication technology (ICT) and the potential to facilitate social and leisure activity for people living with dementia , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Heal..

[58]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[59]  Douglas D. Perkins,et al.  Empowerment theory, research, and application , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[60]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[61]  Tim Brown,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation , 2010 .

[62]  R. Reid,et al.  Paths to psychological empowerment in an urban community: Sense of community and citizen participation in substance abuse prevention activities , 2003 .

[63]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Call for Papers MISQ Special Issue on ICT and Societal Challenges , 2013 .

[64]  Tim Evans,et al.  Tackling the challenges to health equity in China , 2008, The Lancet.

[65]  Farid Shirazi,et al.  Information and communication technology and women empowerment in Iran , 2012, Telematics Informatics.

[66]  M. Gurstein.  Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies , 2000 .

[67]  Diana MacCallum,et al.  Social Innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice , 2013 .

[68]  M. Castells.  Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[69]  Giuseppe Moro,et al.  Evaluating social innovation , 2015 .

[70]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[71]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[72]  James Stewart,et al.  Can technology – based services support long-term care challenges in home care? Analysis of evidence from social innovation good practices across the EU CARICT Project Summary Report , 2012 .

[73]  J. Oetzel,et al.  Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. , 2012, Health education research.

[74]  Marc Schneiberg,et al.  What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950 , 2007 .