Microseismic monitoring of Newberry volcano EGS demonstration.

Hydraulic stimulation of an existing deep, hot well on the west flank of Newberry Volcano was performed in the fall of 2012 as part of the Newberry EGS Demonstration. A microseismic array of 15 stations was installed in the summer to monitor the EGS growth. Eight geophones were installed in 213-246 m deep boreholes, four drilled in the summer of 2012, in order to reduce noise due to scattering in the attenuating volcanic deposits near the surface. Seven surface geophones were installed to further improve locations and allow determination of source mechanisms by enhancing focal sphere coverage. Each station is equipped with a cell phone modem which sends data in real-time to an acquisition server in Seattle After onsite assembly of moderate pressure pumps and piping, injection of cold groundwater into the EGS target well head began October 17 and continued until December 7. 174 microearthquakes with moment magnitudes between 0.0 and 2.4 were located within 1 km of the injection well, defining the EGS reservoir. Multi-zone stimulation was carried out by injecting thermally-degradable zonal isolation materials to plug stimulated fractures and shift stimulation to new fractures. The Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration will allow geothermal industry and academic experts to develop, validate and enhance geoscience and engineering techniques, and other procedures essential to the expansion of EGS. Successful development will demonstrate to the American public that EGS can play a significant role in reducing foreign energy dependence, and provide clean, renewable, and safe baseload geothermal power generation.

[1]  G. Foulger,et al.  NON-DOUBLE-COUPLE EARTHQUAKES 1 , 1998 .

[2]  A Tool for Monitoring Geothermal Systems , 2005 .

[3]  Susan Petty,et al.  Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration — Phase I Results , 2011 .

[4]  A. D. Miller,et al.  Non‐double‐couple earthquake mechanisms at the Hengill‐Grensdalur Volcanic Complex, Southwest Iceland , 1997 .

[5]  Markus Häring,et al.  Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system , 2008 .

[6]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 2000 .

[7]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor , 1989 .

[8]  Friedemann Wenzel,et al.  Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations , 2010 .

[9]  Bruce R. Julian,et al.  Imaging hydraulic fractures in a geothermal reservoir , 2010 .

[10]  Albert Genter,et al.  Seismic response of the fractured and faulted granite of Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) to 5 km deep massive water injections , 2009 .

[11]  Susan Petty,et al.  Improving Geothermal Project Economics with Multi-zone Stimulation: Results from the Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration , 2013 .

[12]  N. Davatzes,et al.  Preliminary Analysis of Stress in the Newberry EGS Well NWG 55-29 , 2011 .

[13]  A. D. Miller,et al.  Non‐double‐couple earthquakes 2. Observations , 1998 .

[14]  B. Julian,et al.  Earthquake mechanisms from linear-programming inversion of seismic-wave amplitude ratios , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Induced seismicity associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems , 2007 .