A primate model for studying focal dystonia and repetitive strain injury: effects on the primary somatosensory cortex.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Job-related repetitive strain injuries (RSIs) are increasing, and current treatment strategies often fail to return injured people to work. This study documented the neural consequences of using two different movement strategies for active, repetitive hand closing and opening. METHODS Two owl monkeys were trained for 20 weeks to repetitively close a handpiece against an 80-g force (3-400 trials per day, training at 80%-90% accuracy). One monkey used a highly articulated hand-squeezing strategy, and the other monkey used a proximal arm-pulling strategy. Changes in motor performance were analyzed, and the electrophysiological maps of the hand representation on the trained primary sensory cortex (area 3b) were compared with those of untrained control animals and the untrained sides of the trained monkeys. RESULTS The monkey using the articulated hand-squeezing strategy showed motor deterioration and dedifferentiation of the normally sharply segregated areas of the hand representation in area 3b. Mild degradation of the hand representation was measured in the monkey using the proximal arm-pulling strategy, but there was no motor dysfunction. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION Attended, highly articulated, repetitive finger squeezing degrades the hand representation and interferes with motor control. A proximal, more variable repetitive strategy minimized the sensory degradation and preserved motor control. Restoring the hand representation may be a critical part of treatment for patients with chronic RSI and focal hand dystonia.

[1]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Sensory dysfunction associated with repetitive strain injuries of tendinitis and focal hand dystonia: a comparative study. , 1996, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[2]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players , 1995, Science.

[3]  Michael M. Merzenich,et al.  MAP: a Macintosh program for generating categorical maps applied to cortical mapping , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Avi Karni,et al.  When practice makes perfect , 1995, The Lancet.

[5]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Responses of tonically active neurons in the primate's striatum undergo systematic changes during behavioral sensorimotor conditioning , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Perlmutter,et al.  Abnormal cortical responses in patients with writer's cramp , 1993, Neurology.

[7]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Dubner,et al.  Activity-dependent neuronal plasticity following tissue injury and inflammation , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  W M Jenkins,et al.  Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys performing a tactile frequency discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Calford,et al.  C-fibres provide a source of masking inhibition to primary somatosensory cortex , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  C. Woolf,et al.  Dynamic alterations in the cutaneous mechanoreceptive fields of dorsal horn neurons in the rat spinal cord , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Dystonia in Musicians , 1989, Seminars in neurology.

[15]  M. Stryker,et al.  Anesthetic state does not affect the map of the hand representation within area 3b somatosensory cortex in owl monkey , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  J. Kaas,et al.  Variability in hand surface representations in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  HunterJ. H Fry,et al.  OVERUSE SYNDROME IN MUSICIANS: PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[18]  P. Wall,et al.  Expansion of receptive fields in the mouse cortical barrelfield after administration of capsaicin to neonates or local application on the infraorbital nerve in adults , 1985, Brain Research.

[19]  Masahiro Sakamoto,et al.  Deficits in manipulative behaviors induced by local injections of muscimol in the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[20]  M. Cynader,et al.  Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  L. Millender,et al.  Occupational disorders of the upper extremity , 1992 .

[22]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. , 1987, Progress in brain research.

[24]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.