Compensatory Knowledge Signaling in Consumer Word-of-Mouth

This paper extends prior research on consumer knowledge beliefs and word-of-mouth transmission. Findings from four studies suggest that people compensate for unfavorable discrepancies between their actual and ideal consumer knowledge with heightened efforts to signal knowledgeability through the content and volume of their word-of-mouth transmissions. This compensatory knowledge signaling effect is moderated by the self-concept relevance (psychological closeness) of the word-of-mouth target and lay beliefs in the self-enhancement benefits of transmitting product knowledge. Content analysis of participants' product communications further supports our knowledge signaling account. The relationship between actual:ideal knowledge discrepancies and heightened word-of-mouth intentions is mediated by the specific negative emotion associated with actual:ideal self-discrepancies. Overall, the findings suggest that the relationship between consumer knowledge and word-of-mouth transmission depends not only on what you think you know, but also on what you wish you knew.

[1]  An Application of the Variable Perspective Model in Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. , 1975 .

[2]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance of Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion , 2004 .

[3]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Desire for Consumption Knowledge , 2013 .

[4]  G. Johns Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. , 1981 .

[5]  J. Edwards The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[6]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Symbolic self‐completion in academia: evidence from department web pages and email signature files , 2009 .

[7]  Luz-Adriana Samper Do the Clothes Make the Man? How Gaps Between Current and Ideal Self Goals Shape Product-Related Perceptions and Behavior , 2011 .

[8]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Self-presentation: managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Pro-anorexics and recovering anorexics differ in their linguistic Internet self-presentation. , 2006, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[10]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[11]  S. C. Wheeler,et al.  The “Shaken Self”: Product Choices as a Means of Restoring Self‐View Confidence , 2009 .

[12]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption , 2008 .

[13]  A. Tesser,et al.  Self‐evaluation maintenance and the perception of friends and strangers , 1982 .

[14]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[15]  Bryan Gibson,et al.  Wanting to appear smart: Hypercriticism as an indirect impression management strategy , 2008 .

[16]  H. Aarts,et al.  Positive affect as implicit motivator: on the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[18]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Global self-esteem: Its relation to specific facets of self-concept and their importance. , 1986 .

[20]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission , 2012 .

[21]  Mark Muraven,et al.  When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. , 1995 .

[22]  Jennifer K. Bosson,et al.  Self-Enhancement Tendencies Among People With High Explicit Self-Esteem: The Moderating Role of Implicit Self-Esteem , 2003 .

[23]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Leslie H. Vincent,et al.  Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships: A Quantitative Analysis of Consumer Research Findings , 2009 .

[25]  Uma R. Karmarkar,et al.  Believe Me, I Have No Idea What I’m Talking About: The Effects of Source Certainty on Consumer Involvement and Persuasion , 2010 .

[26]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. , 1987, Psychological review.

[27]  Yubo Chen,et al.  Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Bernad Batinic,et al.  Evaluation of measurement precision with Rasch-type models: The case of the short Generalized Opinion Leadership Scale , 2011 .

[29]  H. Aarts,et al.  Goal-Discrepant Situations Prime Goal-Directed Actions if Goals Are Temporarily or Chronically Accessible , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  C. Carver,et al.  Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View. , 1990 .

[31]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[32]  Eric M. Schwartz,et al.  What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? , 2011 .

[33]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  A theory of goal systems. , 2002 .

[34]  Katherine Burson Consumer-Product Skill Matching: The Effects of Difficulty on Relative Self-Assessment and Choice , 2007 .

[35]  Julie Radford-Davenport,et al.  Self-presentation in everyday interactions: effects of target familiarity and gender composition. , 1994 .

[36]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Symbolic Self-Completion, Attempted Influence, and Self-Deprecation , 1981 .

[37]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[38]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Intentions and Other Symbolic Contributions to Society , 2008 .

[39]  Amar Cheema,et al.  The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth , 2010 .

[40]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  What If Opinion Leaders Didn't Know More? a Question of Nomological Validity , 1981 .

[41]  Gianfranco Walsh,et al.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Motives for and Consequences of Reading Customer Articulations on the Internet , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[42]  Robert J. Fogelin,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1991 .

[43]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information , 2001 .

[44]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Consumer Knowledge Assessment , 1994 .

[45]  Robert A. Wicklund,et al.  Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption , 1989 .

[46]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: the search for mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[48]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[49]  T. M. Amabile Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. , 1983 .

[50]  James F. Engel,et al.  Word-of-mouth Communication by the Innovator , 1969 .

[51]  J. Beattie,et al.  Objects, decision considerations and self-image in men's and women's impulse purchases. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[52]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[53]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. , 1983 .

[54]  A. Sela,et al.  Unraveling Priming: When Does the Same Prime Activate a Goal versus a Trait? , 2009 .

[55]  J. Zaichkowsky The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[56]  William B. Swann,et al.  Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  Christine Moorman,et al.  Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[58]  H. Markus,et al.  THE DYNAMIC SELF-CONCEPT: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1987 .

[59]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students , 2004 .

[60]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[61]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1988 .

[62]  J. Berry The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat, and What to Buy , 2003 .

[63]  Andrew J. Czaplewski,et al.  eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty , 2006 .

[64]  J. T. Austin,et al.  Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. , 1996 .

[65]  Peter R. Darke,et al.  The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word-of-mouth , 2006 .

[66]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[67]  B. R. Schlenker Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[68]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: how magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information , 2006 .

[70]  Kenneth G. DeMarree,et al.  Self-certainty: Parallels to Attitude Certainty , 2007 .

[71]  K. Gwinner,et al.  WHAT MAKES MAVENS TICK? EXPLORING THE MOTIVES OF MARKET MAVENS INITIATION OF INFORMATION DIFFUSION , 2004 .

[72]  Allen R McConnell,et al.  The Multiple Self-Aspects Framework: Self-Concept Representation and Its Implications , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[73]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: initial validation of a measure. , 1995, Journal of personality assessment.

[74]  David Gal,et al.  When in Doubt, Shout! , 2010, Psychological science.

[75]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  E. Higgins,et al.  Automatic activation of self-discrepancies and emotional syndromes: when cognitive structures influence affect. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[78]  R. Baumeister A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[79]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[80]  J. Schouten Selves in Transition: Symbolic Consumption in Personal Rites of Passage and Identity Reconstruction , 1991 .

[81]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[82]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[83]  James J. Bradac,et al.  Effects of Intensity, Immediacy and Diversity Upon Receiver Attitudes Toward a Belief-Discrepant Message and Its Source , 1980 .

[84]  Jamie Burton,et al.  Why do people read reviews posted on consumer-opinion portals? , 2010 .

[85]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback , 1975 .

[86]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[87]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know , 2000 .

[88]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  More than meets the eye: The influence of implicit and explicit self-esteem on materialism , 2011 .

[89]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[90]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.