Consensus Policy Based Multi-agent Negotiation

Multiagent negotiation may be understood as a consensus based group decision-making which ideally should seek the agreement of all the participants. However, there exist situations where an unanimous agreement is not possible or simply the rules imposed by the system do not seek such unanimous agreement. In this paper we propose to use a consensus policy based mediation framework (CPMF) to perform multiagent negotiations. This proposal fills a gap in the literature where protocols are in most cases indirectly biased to search for a quorum. The mechanisms proposed to perform the exploration of the negotiation space are derived from the Generalized Pattern Search non-linear optimization technique (GPS). The mediation mechanisms are guided by the aggregation of the agent preferences on the set of alternatives the mediator proposes in each negotiation round. Considerable interest is focused on the implementation of the mediation rules where we allow for a linguistic description of the type of agreements needed. We show empirically that CPMF efficiently manages negotiations following predefined consensus policies and solves situations where unanimous agreements are not viable.

[1]  Mark Klein,et al.  Addressing stability issues in mediated complex contract negotiations for constraint-based, non-monotonic utility spaces , 2010, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[2]  Ryszard Kowalczyk,et al.  Searching for fair joint gains in agent-based negotiation , 2009, AAMAS.

[3]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators , 1997 .

[4]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Constraint proposal method for computing Pareto solutions in multi-party negotiations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications , 1997 .

[6]  V. Torczon,et al.  Direct search methods: then and now , 2000 .

[7]  Lin Padgham,et al.  Negotiating flexible agreements by combining distributive and integrative negotiation , 2007, Intell. Decis. Technol..

[8]  Hiromitsu Hattori,et al.  A multi-issue negotiation protocol among agents with nonlinear utility functions , 2008, Multiagent Grid Syst..

[9]  Ivan Marsá-Maestre,et al.  Improving trade-offs in automated bilateral negotiations for expressive and inexpressive scenarios , 2010, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[10]  Ivan Marsá-Maestre,et al.  A REGION‐BASED MULTI‐ISSUE NEGOTIATION PROTOCOL FOR NONMONOTONIC UTILITY SPACES , 2011, Comput. Intell..

[11]  S. Zionts,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods , 1999 .

[12]  Mark Klein,et al.  Protocols for Negotiating Complex Contracts , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[13]  L. Zadeh A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[14]  R. Yager Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators , 1996, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Guoming Lai,et al.  A Generic Framework for Automated Multi-attribute Negotiation , 2009 .