Effect of some operational variables on bubble size in a pilot-scale mechanical flotation machine

This work aims to provide a relationship of how the key operational variables of frother type and impeller speed affect the size of bubble (D32). The study was performed using pilot-scale equipment (0.8 m3) that is up to two orders of magnitude larger than equipment used for studies performed to date by others, and incorporated the key process variables of frother type and impeller speed. The results show that each frother family exhibits a unique CCC95-HLB relationship dependent on n (number of C-atoms in alkyl group) and m (number of propylene oxide group). Empirical models were developed to predict CCC95 from HLB associated with other two parameters α and β. The impeller speed-bubble size tests show that D32 is unaffected by increased impeller tip speed across the range of 4.6 to 9.2 m/s (representing the industrial operating range), although D32 starts to increase below 4.6 m/s. The finding is valid for both coalescing and non-coalescing conditions. The results suggest that the bubble size and bubble size distribution (BSD) being created do not change with increasing impeller speed in the quiescent zone of the flotation.

[1]  P. Weiland,et al.  Coalescence behaviour of gas bubbles in aqueous solutions of n-alcohols and fatty acids , 1983 .

[2]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  The empirical prediction of bubble surface area flux in mechanical flotation cells from cell design and operating data , 1999 .

[3]  J. Nesset Modeling the Sauter Mean Bubble Diameter in Mechanical, Forced-air Flotation Machines , 2011 .

[4]  U. Onken,et al.  Inhibition of bubble coalescence by solutes in air/water dispersions , 1982 .

[5]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Bubble size distribution in laboratory scale flotation cells , 2005 .

[6]  James A. Finch,et al.  Development of new frothers through hydrodynamic characterization , 2008 .

[7]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Characterizing Frothers through Critical Coalescence Concentration (CCC)95-Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) Relationship , 2012 .

[8]  D. Reay,et al.  Removal of fine particles from water by dispersed air flotation: effects of bubble size and particle size on collection efficiency , 1973 .

[9]  Yue-hua Hu,et al.  A novel quantificational assessment method of frothers effect on bubble characteristics , 2011 .

[10]  J-P. Franzidis,et al.  Review of hydrodynamics and gas dispersion in flotation cells on South African platinum concentrators , 2000 .

[11]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Water Recovery and Bubble Surface Area Flux in Flotation , 2010 .

[12]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Frother partitioning in dual-frother systems: Development of analytical technique , 2013 .

[13]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  New directions in flotation machine design , 2010 .

[14]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Use of frother with sampling-for-imaging bubble sizing technique , 2009 .

[15]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Determining independent control of dual-frother systems – Gas holdup, bubble size and water overflow rate , 2012 .

[16]  James A. Finch,et al.  Bubble break-up and the role of frother and salt , 2009 .