Optimisation and analysis of microreactor designs for microfluidic gradient generation using a purpose built optical detection system for entire chip imaging.

This paper presents and fully characterises a novel simplification approach for the development of microsystem based concentration gradient generators with significantly reduced microfluidic networks. Three microreactors are presented; a pair of two-inlet six-outlet (2-6) networks and a two-inlet eleven-outlet (2-11) network design. The mathematical approach has been validated experimentally using a purpose built optical detection system. The experimental results are shown to be in very good agreement with the theoretical predictions from the model. The developed networks are proven to deliver precise linear concentration gradients (R(2) = 0.9973 and 0.9991 for the (2-6) designs) and the simplified networks are shown to provide enhanced performance over conventional designs, overcoming some of the practical issues associated with traditional networks. The optical measurements were precise enough to validate the linearity in each level of the conventional (2-6) networks (R(2) ranged from 0.9999 to 0.9973) compared to R(2) = 1 for the theoretical model. CFD results show that there is an effective upper limit on the operating flow rate. The new simplified (2-11) design was able to maintain a linear outlet profile up to 0.8 microl/s per inlet (R(2) = 0.9992). The proposed approach is widely applicable for the production of linear and arbitrary concentration profiles, with the potential for high throughput applications that span a wide range of chemical and biological studies.

[1]  Francis Lin,et al.  Generation of dynamic temporal and spatial concentration gradients using microfluidic devices. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[2]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Electrokinetic generation of temporally and spatially stable concentration gradients in microchannels. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  J. Wikswo,et al.  Characterization of transport in microfluidic gradient generators , 2008 .

[5]  David R. Emerson,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of a droplet-based PCR chip , 2007 .

[6]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Control of crystal nucleation by patterned self-assembled monolayers , 1999, Nature.

[7]  S. Siddhaye,et al.  System-level modeling and simulation of biochemical assays in lab-on-a-chip devices , 2007 .

[8]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Applications of microfluidics in chemical biology. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[9]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Generation of Solution and Surface Gradients Using Microfluidic Systems , 2000 .

[10]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  C. Cabrera,et al.  Generation of natural pH gradients in microfluidic channels for use in isoelectric focusing , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  R. Hayes,et al.  A study of two-dimensional dispersion in unconsolidated porous media , 1990 .

[13]  T. Mukherjee,et al.  Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering Systematic Modeling of Microfluidic Concentration Gradient Generators , 2022 .

[14]  Robert W Barber,et al.  Biomimetic design of microfluidic manifolds based on a generalised Murray's law. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[15]  A. Groisman,et al.  Generation of complex concentration profiles in microchannels in a logarithmically small number of steps. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[16]  A. Scherer,et al.  Applications of microfluidics for neuronal studies , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[17]  N. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  A linear dilution microfluidic device for cytotoxicity assays. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Application of microfluidic chip to realize controllable pH gradient , 2005 .

[19]  Shur-Jen Wang,et al.  A parallel-gradient microfluidic chamber for quantitative analysis of breast cancer cell chemotaxis , 2006, Biomedical microdevices.

[20]  P. J. B. Koeck.  Quantization errors in averaged digitized data , 2001, Signal Process..

[21]  A. Engler,et al.  Photopolymerization in Microfluidic Gradient Generators: Microscale Control of Substrate Compliance to Manipulate Cell Response , 2004 .

[22]  Darko Stefanovic,et al.  Characterization of transverse channel concentration profiles obtainable with a class of microfluidic networks. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[23]  Peter R. Fielden,et al.  Novel microsystems for concentration gradient generation through computer optimization with validation using optical instrumentation , 2008 .

[24]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Generation of Gradients Having Complex Shapes Using Microfluidic Networks , 2001 .

[25]  M. Toner,et al.  Universal microfluidic gradient generator. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  J. Wikswo,et al.  Effects of flow and diffusion on chemotaxis studies in a microfabricated gradient generator. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[27]  O. Orwar,et al.  Microfluidics for cell-based assays , 2005 .

[28]  Armand Ajdari,et al.  Steady flows in networks of microfluidic channels: building on the analogy with electrical circuits , 2004 .

[29]  H. El-Samad,et al.  Bound attractant at the leading vs. the trailing edge determines chemotactic prowess , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Xingyu Jiang,et al.  Potentiometric titrations in a poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic device. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Fabrication of gradient hydrogels using a microfluidics/photopolymerization process. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  P. Cremer,et al.  Generating fixed concentration arrays in a microfluidic device , 2003 .