Human Information Interaction and the Cognitive Predicting Theory of Trust

This perspectives paper proposes a conceptualization of trust that does not require a predefined feature space, but rather is dynamically formed at the point of information interaction through a cognitive predicting mechanism. Trust is a significant issue in the current information context due to fake news, echo chambers, filter bubbles, and confirmation biases which can result in a disconnect between human trust expectations and information trustworthiness, making it difficult to establish a feature space within which trust might be modeled. In response to this, we present our Cognitive Predicting Theory of Trust (CPTT) which allows trust to be modeled without the requirement of a predefined feature space. Drawn from the cognitive theory of Predictive Processing, CPTT describes how people form trust judgments based on cognitive predictions within a system of information interactions. We outline how this CPTT view of trust might be modeled using complex systems and provide examples showing how curation of the information interaction environment can affect the trust associated with the system. We conclude by proposing that our perspective opens up two avenues for exploration in Computer Human Information Interaction and Retrieval: (1) the need for alternative models, and (2) the value of curating the information environment.

[1]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[2]  Donn Byrne,et al.  An Overview (and Underview) of Research and Theory within the Attraction Paradigm , 1997 .

[3]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  L. PytlikZillig,et al.  Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? , 2015 .

[5]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  The neural basis of agency: An fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  An Active Inference view of cognitive control , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[7]  Clifford A. Lynch When documents deceive: trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web , 2001 .

[8]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Uncanny valley as a window into predictive processing in the social brain , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Robert M. Chesney,et al.  Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security , 2018 .

[10]  Giulio Cimini,et al.  Effective Mechanism for Social Recommendation of News , 2011, ArXiv.

[11]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[12]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[13]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Personalisation and Trust: A Reciprocal Relationship? , 2004, Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce.

[14]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley , 2016, Cognition.

[15]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Interoceptive predictions in the brain , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[17]  Patricia Senn Breivik,et al.  21st century learning and information literacy , 2005 .

[18]  Carl Wieman,et al.  Change : The Magazine of Higher Learning , 2015 .

[19]  Ricarda I. Schubotz,et al.  Prediction, Cognition and the Brain , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[21]  Ryen W. White Beliefs and biases in web search , 2013, SIGIR.

[22]  Claude Draude,et al.  Intermediaries: reflections on virtual humans, gender, and the Uncanny Valley , 2011, Ai & Society.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding under the free-energy principle , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Clare-Marie Karat,et al.  Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce , 2004, Human-Computer Interaction Series.

[25]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on neuro‐information science , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[27]  Falk Lieder,et al.  Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources , 2019, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction Between Trust and Confidence1 , 2006 .

[29]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  Perceived Threat and Corroboration: Key Factors That Improve a Predictive Model of Trust in Internet-based Health Information and Advice , 2011, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[30]  Kenneth Lee,et al.  Dr Google Is Here to Stay but Health Care Professionals Are Still Valued: An Analysis of Health Care Consumers’ Internet Navigation Support Preferences , 2017, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[31]  Sandip Sarkar,et al.  Predictive Coding: A Possible Explanation of Filling-In at the Blind Spot , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .