Assessing Natural Resource Use by Forest-Reliant Communities in Madagascar Using Functional Diversity and Functional Redundancy Metrics

Biodiversity plays an integral role in the livelihoods of subsistence-based forest-dwelling communities and as a consequence it is increasingly important to develop quantitative approaches that capture not only changes in taxonomic diversity, but also variation in natural resources and provisioning services. We apply a functional diversity metric originally developed for addressing questions in community ecology to assess utilitarian diversity of 56 forest plots in Madagascar. The use categories for utilitarian plants were determined using expert knowledge and household questionnaires. We used a null model approach to examine the utilitarian (functional) diversity and utilitarian redundancy present within ecological communities. Additionally, variables that might influence fluctuations in utilitarian diversity and redundancy—specifically number of felled trees, number of trails, basal area, canopy height, elevation, distance from village—were analyzed using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Eighteen of the 56 plots showed utilitarian diversity values significantly higher than expected. This result indicates that these habitats exhibited a low degree of utilitarian redundancy and were therefore comprised of plants with relatively distinct utilitarian properties. One implication of this finding is that minor losses in species richness may result in reductions in utilitarian diversity and redundancy, which may limit local residents' ability to switch between alternative choices. The GLM analysis showed that the most predictive model included basal area, canopy height and distance from village, which suggests that variation in utilitarian redundancy may be a result of local residents harvesting resources from the protected area. Our approach permits an assessment of the diversity of provisioning services available to local communities, offering unique insights that would not be possible using traditional taxonomic diversity measures. These analyses introduce another tool available to conservation biologists for assessing how future losses in biodiversity will lead to a reduction in natural resources and provisioning services from forests.

[1]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity--ecosystem-function relationships. , 2011, Ecology.

[2]  P. McElwee.  Resource Use Among Rural Agricultural Households Near Protected Areas in Vietnam: The Social Costs of Conservation and Implications for Enforcement , 2010, Environmental management.

[3]  M. Gavin.  Conservation implications of rainforest use patterns: mature forests provide more resources but secondary forests supply more medicine , 2009 .

[4]  K. V. van Dijk,et al.  Genome-Wide mRNA Expression Analysis of Hepatic Adaptation to High-Fat Diets Reveals Switch from an Inflammatory to Steatotic Transcriptional Program , 2009, PloS one.

[5]  The Role of Demography and Markets in Determining Deforestation Rates Near Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Gudeta W. Sileshi,et al.  The miombo woodlands at the cross roads: Potential threats, sustainable livelihoods, policy gaps and challenges , 2009 .

[7]  Y. Youn.  Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: Cases in South Korea , 2009 .

[8]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[9]  T. Dawson,et al.  Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services , 2009 .

[10]  K. Brown,et al.  Protected Area Safeguard Tree and Shrub Communities from Degradation and Invasion: A Case Study in Eastern Madagascar , 2009, Environmental management.

[11]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[12]  John N. Griffin,et al.  Functional diversity predicts overyielding effect of species combination on primary productivity , 2009 .

[13]  P. Davidar,et al.  Why do local households harvest forest products? A case study from the southern Western Ghats, India. , 2008 .

[14]  C. Shackleton,et al.  'Rich man poor man' — inter-household and community factors influencing the use of wild plant resources amongst rural households in South Africa , 2008 .

[15]  David Mouillot,et al.  Evidence that niche specialization explains species-energy relationships in lake fish communities. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  Compton J. Tucker,et al.  Fifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar , 2007, Environmental Conservation.

[17]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Low functional diversity and no redundancy in British avian assemblages. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Dendrograms and measuring functional diversity , 2007 .

[20]  G. Anderson,et al.  Socioeconomic predictors of forest use values in the Peruvian Amazon: A potential tool for biodiversity conservation , 2007 .

[21]  P. Schachenmann.  Spiritual Values in Madagascar , 2006 .

[22]  A. Sparrow,et al.  Assembly rules operating along a primary riverbed–grassland successional sequence , 2006 .

[23]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  The economic importance of freshwater crayfish harvesting in Madagascar and the potential of community-based conservation to improve management , 2006, Oryx.

[24]  William G. Lee,et al.  Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity , 2005 .

[25]  T. Dawson,et al.  Tree Structure and Diversity in Human-Impacted Littoral Forests, Madagascar , 2005, Environmental management.

[26]  C. Kremen.  Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[27]  B. Halpern,et al.  Low functional redundancy in coastal marine assemblages , 2005 .

[28]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Limiting similarity and functional diversity along environmental gradients , 2005 .

[29]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[30]  Naeem,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis , 2005 .

[31]  N. Poole,et al.  Livelihood gains and ecological costs of non-timber forest product dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India , 2004, Environmental Conservation.

[32]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[33]  J. Tabuti,et al.  Firewood use in Bulamogi County, Uganda: species selection, harvesting and consumption patterns , 2003 .

[34]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[35]  Steven M. Goodman,et al.  The Natural History of Madagascar , 2003 .

[36]  P. Ferraro.  The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar , 2002 .

[37]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[38]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[39]  T. Enters,et al.  Forest products and household economy: a case study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India , 2000, Environmental Conservation.

[40]  Michael Arnold,et al.  What futures for the people of the tropical forests , 1999 .

[41]  K. Lance,et al.  An Interdisciplinary Tool for Monitoring Conservation Impacts in Madagascar , 1998 .

[42]  Joe Peters.  Transforming the Integrated Conservation and Development Project (ICDP) Approach: Observations from the Ranomafana National Park Project, Madagascar , 1998 .

[43]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion : new questions from old patterns , 1995 .

[44]  D. Hull.  Rich man, poor man , 1984, Nature.

[45]  H. Miller.  Rich Man, Poor Man , 1971 .