The Financial Management of Catastrophic Flood Risks in Emerging‐Economy Countries

This article examines the potential of pre- and post-disaster instruments for funding disaster response and recovery and for creating incentives for flood loss mitigation in countries with emerging or transition economies. As a concrete case, we discuss the disaster recovery arrangements following the 1997 flood disaster in Poland. We examine the advantages and limitations of hedging instruments, which are instruments for transferring the risk to investors either through insurance or capital market-based securities. We compare these mechanisms with financing instruments whereby the government sets aside funds prior to a disaster or taps its own funding sources after the event occurs. We show how hedging instruments can be designed to create incentives for the mitigation of damage to public infrastructure using the flood proofing of a water-treatment plant on the hypothetical Topping River as an illustrative example. We conclude that hedging instruments can be an attractive alternative to financing instruments that have been traditionally used in the poorer, emerging-economy countries to fund disaster recovery. Since very poor countries are likely to have difficulty paying the price of protection prior to a disaster, we suggest that international lending institutions consider innovations for subsidizing these payments.

[1]  T. Ermolieva,et al.  Estimating natural catastrophic risk exposure and the benefits of risk transfer in developing countries , 1999 .

[2]  N. Fenton The Personal Interview , 1934 .

[3]  Weimin Dong,et al.  Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance against Natural Disasters in the United States , 1999 .

[4]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  A Cat Bond Premium Puzzle? , 2000 .

[5]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  The Role of Insurance in Managing Extreme Events: Implications for Terrorism Coverage , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Gilbert F. White,et al.  Assessment Of Research On Natural Hazards , 1975 .

[7]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[8]  Gilbert F. White,et al.  The hidden costs of coastal hazards : implications for risk assessment and mitigation , 2000 .

[9]  P. K. Freeman Infrastructure, natural disasters, and poverty , 1999 .

[10]  Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer,et al.  Stakeholder Views on Flood Risk Management in Hungary's Upper Tisza Basin , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  J. Stripple Securitizing the Risks of Climate Change. Institutional Innovations in the Insurance of Catastrophic Risks , 1998 .

[12]  U. Rosenthal,et al.  Flood Response Dynamics: Local Resilience and Administrative Flexibility , 1998 .

[13]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  The Complementary Roles of Mitigation and Insurance in Managing Catastrophic Risks , 1999 .

[14]  Kenneth A. Froot,et al.  The Pricing of U.S. Catastrophe Reinsurance , 1997 .

[15]  Paul 't Hart,et al.  Flood response and crisis management in Western Europe : a comparative analysis , 1998 .

[16]  R. Platt,et al.  Sharing the Challenge: Floodplain Management into the 21st Century , 1995 .

[17]  A. Amendola,et al.  Global change and catastrophe risk management: Flood risks in Europe , 1999 .

[18]  Eban S. Goodstein Economics and the environment , 1995 .

[19]  Principles of Floodplain Management , 1995 .

[20]  David C. Croson,et al.  Customizing Indemnity Contracts and Indexed Cat Bonds for Natural Hazard Risks , 2000 .

[21]  Gerhard A Berz,et al.  World Map of Natural Hazards – A Global View of the Distribution and Intensity of Significant Exposures , 2001 .

[22]  Aniello Amendola,et al.  Global Change, Natural Disasters and Loss-sharing: Issues of Efficiency and Equity , 2000 .

[23]  Irving M. Mintzer,et al.  Confronting climate change : risks, implications and responses , 1992 .