Influences of initial pH on performance and anodic microbes of fed‐batch microbial fuel cells

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of pH on performance and anodic microbes of MFCs (microbial fuel cells), double-chamber MFCs were fed-batch operated at four different values of initial pH (4, 5, 6, and 7) and the changes in anodic microbes (species and appearance) were studied. RESULTS: Lower voltage outputs (232–284 mV vs. 311–339 mV) and power generation (95–116 mW m−2 vs. 182–237 mW m−2) with faster COD removal were obtained under acidic pH conditions. Simplicispira, Variovorax, Comamonas, and Acinetobacter were the major communities under acidic conditions, while Chlorobi, Aquaspirillum, and Sphingomonas were in the majority under neutral conditions. Anodic biofilms cracked and reduced at pH ≤5. MFCs operated at pH 4 failed to recover optimal electricity generation when pH was readjusted to 7. There were significant correlations between the time-course pH changes (anodic and cathodic) and voltage outputs of the MFC under neutral conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Injured anodic microbes and biofilms may be the reason for decreased MFC performance under acidic conditions. pH ≤4 may cause long-term, even irreversible reduction to MFC performances. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

[1]  M. Ghangrekar,et al.  Performance of microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and substrate concentration. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[2]  F. Harnisch,et al.  Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  P. N. Sarma,et al.  Effect of anodic pH microenvironment on microbial fuel cell (MFC) performance in concurrence with aerated and ferricyanide catholytes , 2009 .

[4]  B. Logan,et al.  Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. , 2006, Trends in microbiology.

[5]  S. Venkata Mohan,et al.  Behavior of single chambered mediatorless microbial fuel cell (MFC) at acidophilic, neutral and alkaline microenvironments during chemical wastewater treatment , 2009 .

[6]  Li Zhuang,et al.  Enhanced performance of air-cathode two-chamber microbial fuel cells with high-pH anode and low-pH cathode. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Glenn R. Johnson,et al.  The influence of acidity on microbial fuel cells containing Shewanella oneidensis. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[8]  Kyu-Jung Chae,et al.  Methanogenesis control by employing various environmental stress conditions in two-chambered microbial fuel cells. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[9]  J. Costerton,et al.  Introduction to biofilm. , 1999, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[10]  K. Rabaey,et al.  Microbial electrosynthesis — revisiting the electrical route for microbial production , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[11]  Ralf Cord-Ruwisch,et al.  Affinity of microbial fuel cell biofilm for the anodic potential. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S Venkata Mohan,et al.  Influence of anodic biofilm growth on bioelectricity production in single chambered mediatorless microbial fuel cell using mixed anaerobic consortia. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[13]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Development of an rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe specific for the genus Acinetobacter and its application for in situ monitoring in activated sludge , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  Kazuya Watanabe,et al.  Methanogenesis versus Electrogenesis: Morphological and Phylogenetic Comparisons of Microbial Communities , 2008, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[15]  Marc Serra,et al.  Effect of pH on nutrient dynamics and electricity production using microbial fuel cells. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[16]  Hong Liu,et al.  Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  H. Lappin-Scott,et al.  Influence of electric fields and pH on biofilm structure as related to the bioelectric effect , 1997, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[18]  Derek R. Lovley,et al.  Novel strategy for three-dimensional real-time imaging of microbial fuel cell communities: monitoring the inhibitory effects of proton accumulation within the anode biofilm , 2009 .

[19]  Woojun Park,et al.  Simplicispira limi sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. , 2007, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[20]  Allison M. Horst,et al.  Enhanced visualization of microbial biofilms by staining and environmental scanning electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of microbiological methods.

[21]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure , 2006 .

[22]  H. Hamelers,et al.  Effects of membrane cation transport on pH and microbial fuel cell performance. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Performance of a batch two-chambered microbial fuel cell operated at different anode potentials , 2011 .

[24]  Boris Tartakovsky,et al.  The influence of operational conditions on the performance of a microbial fuel cell seeded with mesophilic anaerobic sludge. , 2010 .

[25]  P. de Vos,et al.  Bioaugmentation of Activated Sludge by an Indigenous 3-Chloroaniline-Degrading Comamonas testosteroni Strain, I2gfp , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  In S. Kim,et al.  Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[27]  M. Behera,et al.  Performance of microbial fuel cell in response to change in sludge loading rate at different anodic feed pH. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[28]  C. Tsouris,et al.  A microbial fuel cell operating at low pH using the acidophile Acidiphilium cryptum , 2008, Biotechnology Letters.