Mutational signature distribution varies with DNA replication timing and strand asymmetry

BackgroundDNA replication plays an important role in mutagenesis, yet little is known about how it interacts with other mutagenic processes. Here, we use somatic mutation signatures—each representing a mutagenic process—derived from 3056 patients spanning 19 cancer types to quantify the strand asymmetry of mutational signatures around replication origins and between early and late replicating regions.ResultsWe observe that most of the detected mutational signatures are significantly correlated with the timing or direction of DNA replication. The properties of these associations are distinct for different signatures and shed new light on several mutagenic processes. For example, our results suggest that oxidative damage to the nucleotide pool substantially contributes to the mutational landscape of esophageal adenocarcinoma.ConclusionsTogether, our results indicate an interaction between DNA replication, the associated damage repair, and most mutagenic processes.

[1]  K. Yasumoto,et al.  Induction of Chromosomal Gene Mutations in Escherichia coli by Direct Incorporation of Oxidatively Damaged Nucleotides , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  W. Mcgregor,et al.  Abnormal, Error-Prone Bypass of Photoproducts by Xeroderma Pigmentosum Variant Cell Extracts Results in Extreme Strand Bias for the Kinds of Mutations Induced by UV Light , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  M. Cordeiro‐Stone,et al.  Asymmetry of DNA replication and translesion synthesis of UV-induced thymine dimers. , 2002, Mutation research.

[4]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Evidence for Preferential Mismatch Repair of Lagging Strand DNA Replication Errors in Yeast , 2003, Current Biology.

[5]  Á. Lanas,et al.  Free radicals and antioxidant systems in reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. , 2005, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  G. Walker,et al.  The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R. Sampliner,et al.  Bile acids in combination with low pH induce oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage: relevance to the pathogenesis of Barrett’s oesophagus , 2006, Gut.

[8]  K. Fuchs,et al.  Importance of duodenogastric reflux in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  H. Kamiya Mutations Induced by Oxidized DNA Precursors and Their Prevention by Nucleotide Pool Sanitization Enzymes , 2007 .

[10]  M. Färkkilä,et al.  The expression of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in oesophageal tissues and tumours. , 2007, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  H. Harashima,et al.  Mutagenic effects of 8-hydroxy-dGTP in live mammalian cells. , 2007, Free radical biology & medicine.

[12]  B. Stillman DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[13]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases , 2008, Cell Research.

[14]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[15]  H. Harashima,et al.  Involvement of specialized DNA polymerases in mutagenesis by 8-hydroxy-dGTP in human cells. , 2009, DNA repair.

[16]  Sarah V. Mudrak,et al.  The Polymerase η Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerase Acts Independently of the Mismatch Repair System To Limit Mutagenesis Caused by 7,8-Dihydro-8-Oxoguanine in Yeast , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  H. Harashima,et al.  Effects of base excision repair proteins on mutagenesis by 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-hydroxyguanine) paired with cytosine and adenine. , 2010, DNA repair.

[18]  R. Souza,et al.  The role of acid and bile reflux in oesophagitis and Barrett's metaplasia. , 2010, Biochemical Society transactions.

[19]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Differential correction of lagging-strand replication errors made by DNA polymerases α and δ , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  A. Murray,et al.  Mutation Rates across Budding Yeast Chromosome VI Are Correlated with Replication Timing , 2011, Genome biology and evolution.

[21]  Kristian Cibulskis,et al.  Genomic sequencing of colorectal adenocarcinomas identifies a recurrent VTI1A-TCF7L2 fusion , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[22]  N. de Wind,et al.  DNA damage bypass operates in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and exhibits differential mutagenicity , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  Wendy S. W. Wong,et al.  Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs , 2012, Bioinform..

[24]  I. Rogozin,et al.  Modulation of mutagenesis in eukaryotes by DNA replication fork dynamics and quality of nucleotide pools , 2012, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[25]  Data production leads,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[26]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Mismatch Repair Balances Leading and Lagging Strand DNA Replication Fidelity , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[27]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Erosive reflux disease increases risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma, compared with nonerosive reflux. , 2012, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[28]  Paz Polak,et al.  Differential relationship of DNA replication timing to different forms of human mutation and variation. , 2012, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[30]  Jean-Michel Marin,et al.  Unraveling cell type–specific and reprogrammable human replication origin signatures associated with G-quadruplex consensus motifs , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[32]  A. McKenna,et al.  Exome and whole genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[33]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Noncanonical role of the 9-1-1 clamp in the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[34]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[35]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer genes , 2014 .

[36]  M. Stratton,et al.  Deciphering Signatures of Mutational Processes Operative in Human Cancer , 2013, Cell reports.

[37]  Alexander M. Metcalf,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency endows tumors with a unique mutation signature and sensitivity to DNA double-strand breaks , 2014, eLife.

[38]  M. Kloor,et al.  Mutations in POLE and survival of colorectal cancer patients – link to disease stage and treatment , 2014, Cancer medicine.

[39]  Serena Nik-Zainal,et al.  Mechanisms underlying mutational signatures in human cancers , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  S. Jentsch,et al.  DNA bending facilitates the error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway and upholds genome integrity , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[41]  Shibing Deng,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive molecular profiling identify new driver mutations in gastric cancer , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[42]  Chris Sander,et al.  Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication , 2014, Genome research.

[43]  Peter J. Campbell,et al.  Genomic catastrophes frequently arise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and drive tumorigenesis , 2014, Nature Communications.

[44]  M. Eremets,et al.  Ammonia as a case study for the spontaneous ionization of a simple hydrogen-bonded compound , 2014, Nature Communications.

[45]  Ben Lehner,et al.  Differential DNA mismatch repair underlies mutation rate variation across the human genome , 2015, Nature.

[46]  X. Bi Mechanism of DNA damage tolerance. , 2015, World journal of biological chemistry.

[47]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Reconstitution of a eukaryotic replisome reveals suppression mechanisms that define leading/lagging strand operation , 2015, eLife.

[48]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Tracking the genomic evolution of esophageal adenocarcinoma through neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[49]  Do mutational dynamics in stem cells explain the origin of common cancers? , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[50]  John M. Urban,et al.  Characterizing and controlling intrinsic biases of lambda exonuclease in nascent strand sequencing reveals phasing between nucleosomes and G-quadruplex motifs around a subset of human replication origins , 2015, Genome research.

[51]  M. Méchali,et al.  DNA replication origin activation in space and time , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[52]  S. Tavaré,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing provides new insights into the clonal architecture of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[53]  Roland Arnold,et al.  Combined hereditary and somatic mutations of replication error repair genes result in rapid onset of ultra-hypermutated cancers , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[54]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions , 2015, Science.

[55]  M. Stratton,et al.  The genome as a record of environmental exposure , 2015, Mutagenesis.

[56]  Martin A. M. Reijns,et al.  Lagging strand replication shapes the mutational landscape of the genome , 2015, Nature.

[57]  S. Antonarakis,et al.  APOBEC-induced mutations in human cancers are strongly enriched on the lagging DNA strand during replication , 2016, Genome research.

[58]  E. Birney,et al.  The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[59]  Non mutagenic and mutagenic DNA damage tolerance , 2016, Cell cycle.

[60]  H. Kamiya,et al.  Mutations induced by 8-hydroxyguanine (8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine), a representative oxidized base, in mammalian cells , 2016, Genes and Environment.

[61]  M. Weitzman,et al.  APOBEC3A damages the cellular genome during DNA replication , 2016, Cell cycle.

[62]  A. Rust,et al.  Adenoma development in familial adenomatous polyposis and MUTYH‐associated polyposis: somatic landscape and driver genes , 2015, The Journal of pathology.

[63]  G. Sella,et al.  Interpreting the Dependence of Mutation Rates on Age and Time , 2015, PLoS biology.

[64]  P. Hanawalt,et al.  Mutational Strand Asymmetries in Cancer Genomes Reveal Mechanisms of DNA Damage and Repair , 2016, Cell.

[65]  P. Mieczkowski,et al.  APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Preferentially Deaminate the Lagging Strand Template during DNA Replication. , 2016, Cell reports.

[66]  J. Lieb,et al.  Genome-wide kinetics of DNA excision repair in relation to chromatin state and mutagenesis , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  P. Arkkila,et al.  Increased Oxidative Stress in the Proximal Stomach of Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction1 , 2016, Translational oncology.

[68]  B. Taylor,et al.  deconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution , 2016, Genome Biology.

[69]  Simon Tavaré,et al.  Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[70]  D. Branzei,et al.  DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structures , 2016, DNA repair.

[71]  T. Kunkel,et al.  DNA Polymerases Divide the Labor of Genome Replication. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.

[72]  S. Nikolaev,et al.  Human mismatch repair system balances mutation rates between strands by removing more mismatches from the lagging strand , 2017, Genome Research.

[73]  M. Tomková,et al.  DNA Replication and associated repair pathways are involved in the mutagenesis of methylated cytosine. , 2018, DNA repair.

[74]  Erratum to "DNA Replication and associated repair pathways are involved in the mutagenesis of methylated cytosine"[DNA Repair, 62 (2018) 1-7]. , 2018, DNA repair.