From procedural to transformative: A review of the evolution of effectiveness in EIA

[1]  M. Niță,et al.  A river runs through it? Exploring the contestation of Environmental Impact Assessment procedures for small hydropower projects , 2023, Energy Research & Social Science.

[2]  Tyler A. Scott,et al.  Toward NEPA performance: A framework for assessing EIAs , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[3]  A. Bond,et al.  Characterising the collaboration between academia and practice in UK environmental assessment , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[4]  U. Pröbstl-Haider.  EIA Effectiveness in Sensitive Alpine Areas: A Comparison of Winter Tourism Infrastructure Development in Germany and Austria , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  I. Ioja,et al.  A review of the quality of environmental impact statements with a focus on urban projects from Romania , 2022, Ecol. Informatics.

[6]  Tetsuya Kamijo.  How to enhance EIA systems in developing countries: a quantitative literature review , 2022, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[7]  L. Rozylowicz,et al.  Researchers' perspective on the main strengths and weaknesses of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[8]  Deniz Çolakkadioğlu.  An evaluation of EIA system performance in Turkey in the context of procedural effectiveness , 2021, Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law.

[9]  L. Stringer,et al.  Evaluating the performance and procedural effectiveness of Namibia's Environmental Impact Assessment system , 2021 .

[10]  F. Vanclay,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a national environmental and social impact assessment system: lessons from Uganda , 2021, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.

[11]  M. Zamorano,et al.  Effectiveness of environmental impact statement methods: A Colombian case study. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Jinhee Kim,et al.  HIA and EIA Are Different, but Maybe Not in the Way We Thought They Were: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  A. Bond,et al.  Reflecting on, and revising, international best practice principles for EIA follow-up , 2021, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[14]  Camilo M. Botero,et al.  Challenges at the early stages of the environmental licensing procedure and potential contributions from geomorphology , 2021 .

[15]  D. Cilliers,et al.  Environmental impact assessment (EIA) effectiveness in protected areas , 2021 .

[16]  T. Murayama,et al.  Appraising affected community perceptions of implementing programs listed in the environmental impact statement: A case study of Nickel smelter in Indonesia , 2020 .

[17]  Cun-kuan Bao,et al.  Public participation modes in China's environmental impact assessment process: An analytical framework based on participation extent and conflict level , 2020 .

[18]  Aldo Arranz-López,et al.  Revealing EIA process-related barriers in transport projects: The cases of Italy, Portugal, and Spain , 2020 .

[19]  R. Djalante,et al.  From decarbonization to low carbon development and transition: A systematic literature review of the conceptualization of moving toward net-zero carbon dioxide emission (1995–2019) , 2020 .

[20]  A. Morrison‐Saunders,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of integrating the environmental impact assessment and mine closure planning processes , 2020, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[21]  A. Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Gearing up impact assessment as a vehicle for achieving the UN sustainable development goals , 2020, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.

[22]  S. Ahmad,et al.  Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan , 2020 .

[23]  T. Fischer,et al.  Evaluating environmental impact assessment (EIA) in the countries along the belt and road initiatives: System effectiveness and the compatibility with the Chinese EIA , 2020 .

[24]  A. Morrison,et al.  Entrepreneurship in island contexts: A systematic review of the tourism and hospitality literature , 2020, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[25]  W. D. de Vries,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of the environmental impact assessment process in Mongolia for nomadic-pastoral land users , 2020, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.

[26]  A. Bond,et al.  Evolution or revolution? Reflecting on IA effectiveness in Thailand , 2019, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.

[27]  A. Nita.  Empowering impact assessments knowledge and international research collaboration - A bibliometric analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment Review journal , 2019, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[28]  T. Fischer,et al.  Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Germany? – meta-review of SEA research in the light of effectiveness dimensions , 2019, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.

[29]  L. Hedges,et al.  How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Yong Geng,et al.  Responding climate change: A bibliometric review on urban environmental governance , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[31]  Jing Wu,et al.  Environmental impact assessment follow-up for projects in China: Institution and practice , 2018, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[32]  Maria Lampridi,et al.  Greece's reformed EIA system: Evaluating its implementation and potential , 2018, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[33]  A. Bond,et al.  Are current effectiveness criteria fit for purpose? Using a controversial strategic assessment as a test case , 2018 .

[34]  A. Bond,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of mandatory integration of health impact assessment within environmental impact assessment (EIA): a case study of Thailand , 2018 .

[35]  Massimo Aria,et al.  bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[36]  P. Brysiewicz,et al.  A hands-on guide to doing content analysis , 2017, African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence.

[37]  M. Montaño,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS IN SÃO PAULO AND MINAS GERAIS STATES , 2017 .

[38]  Waleed M. Sweileh,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile - health: 2006–2016 , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[39]  S. Kamarthi,et al.  Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature , 2017, PloS one.

[40]  Carla Grigoletto Duarte,et al.  WHAT DOES THE ACADEMIC RESEARCH SAY ABOUT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSING IN BRAZIL , 2017 .

[41]  Urmila Jha-Thakur,et al.  25 years of the UK EIA System: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats , 2016 .

[42]  B. V. D. Leest,et al.  The influence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries —Cases from Georgia and Ghana , 2016 .

[43]  Adèle Paul-Hus,et al.  The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[44]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Introducing the roots, evolution and effectiveness of sustainability assessment , 2015 .

[45]  A. Bond,et al.  Demonstrating the benefits of impact assessment for proponents , 2015 .

[46]  Alan Bond,et al.  Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes , 2013 .

[47]  Vincent Onyango,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EIA AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE: REFLECTING ON 25 YEARS OF EIA PRACTICE IN THE NETHERLANDS AND THE UK , 2012 .

[48]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Walking the sustainability assessment talk — Progressing the practice of environmental impact assessment (EIA) , 2012 .

[49]  A. Bond,et al.  Sustainability assessment: the state of the art , 2012 .

[50]  Richard K. Morgan.  Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art , 2012 .

[51]  Kimmo Jalava,et al.  The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system — What works, what doesn't, and what could be improved? , 2011 .

[52]  Lars Emmelin,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: Theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution , 2010 .

[53]  Andrew Macintosh,et al.  The Australian Government's environmental impact assessment (EIA) regime: using surveys to identify proponent views on cost-effectiveness , 2010 .

[54]  Alan Bond,et al.  Application of the SEA Directive to EU structural funds: Perspectives on effectiveness , 2010 .

[55]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[56]  Alan Bond,et al.  Introduction: The effectiveness of impact assessment instruments , 2009 .

[57]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect , 2007 .

[58]  Thomas Fischer,et al.  What is Wrong with EIA and SEA anyway , 2006 .

[59]  Alan Bond,et al.  The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory , 2004 .

[60]  Douglas Baker,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia's environmental assessment process for first nations' participation in mining development , 2003 .

[61]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  EIA effectiveness and mechanisms of control , 1991 .

[62]  G. Brundtland.  Our Common Future—Call for Action , 1987, Environmental Conservation.

[63]  A. Bond,et al.  Transformative effectiveness: How EIA can transform stakeholders’ frames of reference , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[64]  Maurício Dziedzic,et al.  Evaluating EIA systems' effectiveness: A state of the art , 2018 .

[65]  Nicolas Produit,et al.  A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment , 2018 .

[66]  L. Sánchez,et al.  Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process , 2017 .

[67]  Ivar Lyhne,et al.  Theorising EIA effectiveness : A contribution based on the Danish system , 2017 .

[68]  A. Bond,et al.  Framing effectiveness in impact assessment: Discourse accommodation in controversial infrastructure development , 2015 .

[69]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Framework for comparing and evaluating sustainability assessment practice , 2013 .

[70]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: Towards a better understanding , 2013 .

[71]  A. Bond,et al.  Chapter 3: Challenges in determining the effectiveness of sustainability assessment , 2013 .

[72]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[73]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of EIA follow-up , 2004 .