Sensorimotor memory of weight asymmetry in object manipulation

Using a precision grip-lifting task, we examined how sensorimotor memory for weight asymmetry transfers across changes in hand and object configuration. We measured object tilt when participants lifted a visually symmetric box with an offset centre of mass. Transfer was assessed after participants lifted the box 10 times, during which the large tilt observed in the first lift was reduced. Consistent with previous work of Salimi et al. (J Neurophysiol 84:2390–2397, 2000), we found that when the object was rotated 180°, participants failed to update their sensorimotor memory appropriately. Instead, participants acted as if the object did not rotate and negative transfer was observed. However, when the hand was rotated 180° around the object, participants were able to correctly update sensorimotor memory and positive transfer was observed. This finding argues against the hypothesis that sensorimotor memory is digit-specific because the rotation of the hand (like rotation of the object) changes the forces that each digit must generate to prevent tilt. Positive transfer was also observed when both the hand and object were rotated. This suggests that the rotation of the hand may facilitate rotation of an internal representation of the object. Finally, we found positive transfer of weight asymmetry across the two hands but only when the second hand was rotated such that homologous digits of each hand gripped the same contact surfaces. We suggest that good transfer is observed under these conditions because, when we pass objects from hand to hand, we typically place homologous digits of the two hands in similar locations on the object.

[1]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[2]  R. Johansson,et al.  Independent control of human finger‐tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  P Jenmalm,et al.  Visual and Somatosensory Information about Object Shape Control Manipulative Fingertip Forces , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Wing,et al.  Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability when humans lift objects with different surface curvatures. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of Grip Force When Tilting Objects: Effect of Curvature of Grasped Surfaces and Applied Tangential Torque , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Motor processes in mental rotation , 1998, Cognition.

[10]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability during pronation and supination movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  The influence of visual illusions on grasp position , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  I Salimi,et al.  Specificity of internal representations underlying grasping. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[15]  A. Gordon,et al.  Selective use of visual information signaling objects' center of mass for anticipatory control of manipulative fingertip forces , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models underlying grasp can be additively combined , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Kelly J. Cole,et al.  Distributing vertical forces between the digits during gripping and lifting: the effects of rotating the hand versus rotating the object , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  H. Forssberg,et al.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  R. Johansson,et al.  Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  D. Westwood,et al.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  Marco Santello,et al.  Choice of Contact Points during Multidigit Grasping: Effect of Predictability of Object Center of Mass Location , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.