Structural comparisons of networks and model-based detection of small-worldness

In this paper, we consider the problem of assessing the “level of small-worldness” of a graph and of detecting small-worldness features in real networks. After discussing the limitations of classical approaches, based on the computation of network indicators, we propose a new procedure, which involves the comparison of network structures at different “observation scales”. This allows small-world features to be caught, even if “hidden” deeply into the network structure. Applications of the procedure to both simulated and real data show the effectiveness of the proposal, also in distinguishing between different small-world models and in detecting emerging small-worldness in dynamical networks.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  Network Evolution Based on Centrality , 2010 .

[4]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[6]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  The corporate boards networks , 2004 .

[7]  Maria Axenovich,et al.  On the editing distance of graphs , 2008 .

[8]  Dan Braha,et al.  From Centrality to Temporary Fame: Dynamic Centrality in Complex Networks , 2006, Complex..

[9]  M. Milakovic,et al.  Persistence in corporate networks , 2014 .

[10]  Lada A. Adamic The Small World Web , 1999, ECDL.

[11]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[12]  M. Newman,et al.  Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  Mirko Krivánek,et al.  Simulated Annealing: A Proof of Convergence , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Fabio Bertoni,et al.  The Small-World of Italian Finance: Ownership Interconnections and Board Interlocks Amongst Italian Listed Companies , 2006 .

[15]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[16]  Rosanna Grassi,et al.  Measuring dynamics and structural change of time-dependent socio-economic networks , 2014 .

[17]  M. Weigt,et al.  On the properties of small-world network models , 1999, cond-mat/9903411.

[18]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[19]  Rosanna Grassi,et al.  Interlocking directorates in Italy: persistent links in network dynamics , 2013, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination.

[20]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[21]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The small-world phenomenon: an algorithmic perspective , 2000, STOC '00.

[22]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Networks with the Smallest Average Distance and the Largest Average Clustering , 2010, 1007.4031.

[23]  A. Wilhite,et al.  Bilateral Trade and ‘Small-World’ Networks , 2001 .

[24]  Roberto F. S. Andrade,et al.  Measuring distances between complex networks , 2008 .

[25]  Xuelong Li,et al.  A survey of graph edit distance , 2010, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[26]  L. A. Amaral,et al.  Small‐World Networks and Management Science Research: A Review , 2007 .

[27]  João Barros,et al.  Network Information Flow in Small World Networks , 2006, ArXiv.

[28]  M. Newman Models of the Small World: A Review , 2000, cond-mat/0001118.

[29]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world inside large metabolic networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[31]  V. Cerný Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: An efficient simulation algorithm , 1985 .

[32]  L. Amaral,et al.  Small-World Networks: Evidence for a Crossover Picture , 1999, cond-mat/9903108.

[33]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  The Ubiquity of Small-World Networks , 2011, Brain Connect..

[34]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[35]  Holger Strulik,et al.  From Tradition to Modernity: Economic Growth in a Small World , 2011 .

[36]  Dan Braha,et al.  Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[37]  Paolo Santella,et al.  A Comparison of the Director Networks of the Main Listed Companies in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States , 2009 .

[38]  S. Battiston,et al.  Statistical properties of corporate board and director networks , 2004 .

[39]  M. Newman,et al.  Renormalization Group Analysis of the Small-World Network Model , 1999, cond-mat/9903357.