From Egocentric to Allocentric Spatial Behavior: A Computational Model of Spatial Development

Psychological experiments on children's development of spatial knowledge suggest that experience at self-locomotion and visual tracking are important factors. Yet, the mechanism underlying development is unknown. We propose a robot that learns to track a target object mentally (i.e., maintaining a representation of an object's position when outside the field of view) as a model for spatial development. Mental tracking is considered as prediction of an object's position, given the previous environmental state and motor commands and the current environment state resulting from movement. Following Jordan and Rumelhart's (1992) forward modeling architecture, the system consists of two components: an inverse model of sensory input to desired motor commands and a forward model of motor commands to desired sensory input (goals). The robot was tested on the "three cups"paradigm (in which children are required, under various movement conditions, to select the cup containing the hidden object). Consistent with child development, in the absence of the capacity for self-locomotion, the robot makes errors that are self-center-based. When given the ability for self-locomotion, the robot responds allocentrically.

[1]  L P Acredolo,et al.  The role of self-produced movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  J. G. Wallace,et al.  Cognitive development: An information-processing view , 1976 .

[3]  N. Franceschini,et al.  From insect vision to robot vision , 1992 .

[4]  L. Acredolo,et al.  Laboratory versus home: The effect of environment on the 9-month-old infant's choice of spatial reference system. , 1979 .

[5]  Linda P. Acredolo,et al.  The role of self-produced movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. , 1984 .

[6]  J. Elman Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.

[7]  Joseph J. Campos,et al.  Locomotor Experience: A Facilitator of Spatial Cognitive Development, , 1991 .

[8]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Integrated Architectures for Learning, Planning, and Reacting Based on Approximating Dynamic Programming , 1990, ML.

[9]  R. Schranner Dynamic systems , 1977, Nature.

[10]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Rick O. Gilmore,et al.  Toward a Computational Model of the Development of Saccade Planning , 1998 .

[12]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[13]  Jun Tani,et al.  Self-Organization of Symbolic Processes through Interaction with the Physical World , 1995, IJCAI.

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[17]  Gary L. Drescher,et al.  Made-up minds - a constructivist approach to artificial intelligence , 1991 .