Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild

Directional selection is a major force driving adaptation and evolutionary change. However, the distribution, strength, and tempo of phenotypic selection acting on quantitative traits in natural populations remain unclear across different study systems. We reviewed the literature (1984–1997) that reported the strength of directional selection as indexed by standardized linear selection gradients (β). We asked how strong are viability and sexual selection, and whether strength of selection is correlated with the time scale over which it was measured. Estimates of the magnitude of directional selection (|β|) were exponentially distributed, with few estimates greater than 0.50 and most estimates less than 0.15. Sexual selection (measured by mating success) appeared stronger than viability selection (measured by survival). Viability selection that was measured over short periods (days) was typically stronger than selection measured over longer periods (months and years), but the strength of sexual selection did not vary with duration of selection episodes; as a result, sexual selection was stronger than viability selection over longer time scales (months and years), but not over short time scales (days).

[1]  J. M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Burt,et al.  Natural selection in the wild. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  A. Palmer,et al.  Detecting Publication Bias in Meta‐analyses: A Case Study of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Selection , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[5]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[6]  J. N. Thompson,et al.  Rapid evolution as an ecological process. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  T. Schoener,et al.  Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards , 1997, nature.

[8]  F. H. Rodd,et al.  Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 1997, Science.

[9]  F. Maytag Evolution , 1996, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[10]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  P. Grant,et al.  Oscillating selection on Darwin's finches , 1987, Nature.

[12]  P. Gingerich Rates of Evolution: Effects of Time and Temporal Scaling , 1983, Science.

[13]  P. Grant,et al.  Intense Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches (Geospizinae) in the Gal�pagos , 1981, Science.

[14]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Brittnacher Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila. , 1981, Genetics.

[16]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[17]  M. Clegg,et al.  Viability versus Fecundity Selection in the Slender Wild Oat, Avena barbata L , 1973, Science.

[18]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.