User Interface Designs, Task Categories and Training

This chapter provides a preliminary framework for learner centered user interface design across a variety of training categories. To arrive at this framework, the authors explore (1) user interface design principles and the extent to which they apply to learning environments, (2) the learner centric psychological principles that should be included in the design of learner interfaces, and (3) methods by which training tasks are categorized. The overarching premise of the framework is that designs that are compatible with the psychology of learning promote learning, and ultimately performance, better than those that do not. This seemingly simple concept is sometimes in conflict with user interface design principles for other purposes, such as general purpose websites or marketing campaigns. The framework results in a notional configuration of 27 learner centered training interfaces, which are analyzed for their relevance to user interface design. The chapter concludes with a call for further research to determine best practices in learner interface design.

[1]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number : 1072954 Registered office : , 2010 .

[2]  Susan M. Land,et al.  The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments , 1997 .

[3]  Irene Mavrommati,et al.  Design principles , 2001 .

[4]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Cognitive transfer of spatial awareness states from immersive virtual environments to reality , 2010, TAP.

[5]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[6]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  Fidelity Considerations for Simulation-Based Usability Assessments of Mobile ICT for Hospitals , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Moderating Learner-Centered E-Learning: Problems and Solutions, Benefits and Implications , 2004 .

[8]  D. C. Merrill,et al.  Tutoring: Guided Learning by Doing , 1995 .

[9]  H. Pashler,et al.  Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies , 2010 .

[10]  D. Keegan,et al.  Three Types of Interaction , 2013 .

[11]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  The Seductive Details Effect in Technology-Delivered Instruction. , 2008 .

[12]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[13]  Robert J. Seidel,et al.  Knowledge retention as a latent outcome measure in distance learning , 2001 .

[14]  M. Moore Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[15]  Thanh Giang,et al.  Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[16]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Flight Simulator Training Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis , 1992 .