Prediction of Soil Profile Moisture and Salinity Using AquaCrop Model Under Different Deficit Irrigation and Salinity Treatments

Agrohydrological models that simulate soil moisture and salinity profile are useful tools for improving irrigation management and increasing irrigation efficiency and crop yield. In this study soil moisture and salinity profile were simulated by AquaCrop software, and compared with field measured soil moisture and salinity data. This study was carried out as split plot design (factorial form). Treatments consisted of three levels of irrigation water salinity (S1, S2, S3 corresponding to 1.4, 4.5, 9.6 dS/m) as main plot, two wheat varieties (Ghods and Roshan) and four levels of irrigation water amount (I1, I2, I3, I4 corresponding to 125, 100, 75, 50% of crop water requirement) as sub plot. Based on the results, soil moisture and salinity profiles were moderately sensitive to volumetric water content at the field capacity (θFC), and soil water content at the saturation (θSat) levels, respectively. Overally, the model accuracy in estimation of the moisture was higher than that in estimation of soil salinity at the soil profile. For Roshan cultivar, the average values of NRMSE, NME, d, CRM and R 2 for the simulated soil water contents were 11.72%, 26.81%, 0.79, 0.045, and 0.62, while for the simulated soil salinity they were 24.2%, 52.81%, 0.72, 0.187, and 0.58, respectively. For Ghods cultivar, the average values of these parameters for simulated soil water contents were 11.8%, 26.87%, 0.79, 0.055, and 0.61, while for the simulated soil salinity they were 24.6%, 52.97%, 0.72, 0.193, and 0.57, respectively. The model estimated soil moisture at the deeper soil layers and salinity at the surface soil layers more accurate than those in the surface and deeper soil layers, respectively. According to the statistical indices, the AquaCrop model's accuracy in estimation of the soil moisture at different depths and times was higher than that in estimation of salinity.

[1]  Yanjun Shen,et al.  Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agric Water Manag , 2014 .

[2]  James M. Hamlett,et al.  Validating the FAO aquacrop model for rainfed maize in Pennsylvania , 2013 .

[3]  M. Mkhabela,et al.  Performance of the FAO AquaCrop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in Western Canada , 2012 .

[4]  M. Janat,et al.  Simulating cotton yield response to deficit irrigation with the FAO AquaCrop model , 2011 .

[5]  P. Steduto,et al.  Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran , 2011 .

[6]  K. Zeleke,et al.  Calibration and Testing of the FAO AquaCrop Model for Canola , 2011 .

[7]  H. Farahani,et al.  Parameterization and Evaluation of the AquaCrop Model for Full and Deficit Irrigated Cotton , 2009 .

[8]  D. Raes,et al.  Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop , 2009 .

[9]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description , 2009 .

[10]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop-The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles , 2009 .

[11]  S. Evett,et al.  Validating the FAO AquaCrop Model for Irrigated and Water Deficient Field Maize , 2009 .

[12]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling , 1973 .