A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale

ABSTRACT Successful coping with technology is relevant for mastering daily life. Based on related conceptions, we propose affinity for technology interaction (ATI), defined as the tendency to actively engage in intensive technology interaction, as a key personal resource for coping with technology. We present the 9-item ATI scale, an economical unidimensional scale that assesses ATI as an interaction style rooted in the construct need for cognition (NFC). Results of multiple studies (n > 1500) showed that the scale achieves good to excellent reliability, exhibits expected moderate to high correlations with geekism, technology enthusiasm, NFC, self-reported success in technical problem-solving and technical system learning success, and also with usage of technical systems. Further, correlations of ATI with the Big Five personality dimensions were weak at most. Based on the results, the ATI scale appears to be a promising tool for research applications such as the characterization of user diversity in system usability tests and the construction of general models of user-technology interaction.

[1]  C. Carver.  Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Stress reactions to computer-interactive tasks as a function of task structure and individual differences , 1993, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Anja Strobel,et al.  Same or Different? Clarifying the Relationship of Need for Cognition to Personality and Intelligence , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  María Sicilia,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERACTIVITY IN A WEB SITE: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition , 2005 .

[5]  H. Moosbrugger,et al.  Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion , 2008 .

[6]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[7]  Paul E. Spector.  Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale , 1988 .

[8]  Michael Simonson,et al.  The Reduction of Computer Anxiety , 1993 .

[9]  Samuel Greiff,et al.  A Need for Cognition Scale for Children and Adolescents: Structural Analysis and Measurement Invariance , 2019, European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

[10]  A. Elliot,et al.  Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Thomas Franke,et al.  I track, therefore I walk - Exploring the motivational costs of wearing activity trackers in actual users , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  The Impact of Personality on the Subjective Assessment of Usability , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[14]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[15]  Gordon W. Waugh,et al.  Assessing Computer Anxiety , 1989, Psychological reports.

[16]  C. J. Sadowski,et al.  Need for Cognition in the Big-Five Factor Structure , 1997 .

[17]  K. Lewin.  Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods , 1939, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  A Commentary on Short Questionnaires for Assessing Usability , 2013, Interact. Comput..

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The episodic process of learning by using , 2014 .

[20]  Ross J. Loomis,et al.  Utilizing Need for Cognition and Perceived Self-Efficacy to Predict Academic Performance1 , 2002 .

[21]  T. Richter,et al.  Eine revidierte Fassung des Inventars zur Computerbildung (INCOBI-R) , 2010 .

[22]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[23]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  S Ramnarayan,et al.  Individual Differences in Need for Cognition and Complex Problem Solving , 2000 .

[25]  P. Bobko,et al.  A Model for Predicting Computer Experience from Attitudes Toward Computers , 2001 .

[26]  E. Stotland,et al.  An experimental investigation of need for cognition. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  O. John,et al.  Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German , 2007 .

[28]  A. Furnham,et al.  Need for Cognition Its Dimensionality and Personality and Intelligence Correlates , 2013 .

[29]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Universal Usability , 2000, UBIQ.

[30]  F. Preckel,et al.  Domain-Specificity of Need for Cognition Among High School Students , 2019, European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

[31]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[32]  Cameron D. Norman,et al.  eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  Stefan Hoffmann,et al.  A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness , 2010 .

[34]  A. Elliot,et al.  Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[35]  Martin Schmettow,et al.  What Drives the Geeks? Linking Computer Enthusiasm to Achievement Goals , 2014, BCS HCI.

[36]  R. Sternberg,et al.  A Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles , 2005 .

[37]  R. P. McIntyre,et al.  Empirical Relationships between Need for Cognition and Cognitive Style: Implications for Consumer Psychology , 1994 .

[38]  Pere J. Ferrando,et al.  FACTOR 9.2 , 2013 .

[39]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[40]  Dov Eden,et al.  Impact of enhanced resources on anticipatory stress and adjustment to new information technology: a field-experimental test of conservation of resources theory. , 2009, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[41]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[42]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[43]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. , 2000 .

[44]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Assessing Personality Differences in Human-Technology Interaction: An Overview of Key Self-report Scales to Predict Successful Interaction , 2017, HCI.

[45]  Beatrice Rammstedt,et al.  Can’t We Make It Any Shorter? , 2014 .

[46]  Mario Lehenbauer-Baum,et al.  Towards classification criteria for internet gaming disorder: Debunking differences between addiction and high engagement in a German sample of World of Warcraft players , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Timothy A. Poynton.  Computer literacy across the lifespan: a review with implications for educators , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Mark F. Stasson,et al.  Individual differences in social loafing: Need for cognition as a motivator in collective performance. , 2001 .

[49]  P. MacIntyre,et al.  Motivational Influences on Computer-Related Affective States. , 1999 .

[50]  Matthijs L. Noordzij,et al.  An implicit test of UX: individuals differ in what they associate with computers , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[51]  Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz,et al.  Need for Cognition and Affective Orientation as Predictors of Sales Performance: An Investigation of Main and Interaction Effects , 2008 .

[52]  W. Hacker.  Action Regulation Theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? , 2003 .

[53]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  Human information-processing strategies and style , 1985 .

[54]  Dirk Homscheid,et al.  Crowdsourcing for Survey Research : where Amazon Mechanical Turks deviates from conventional survey methods , 2015 .

[55]  M. Frese,et al.  Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. , 1994 .

[56]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[57]  Stephen R. Hawk,et al.  Locus of Control and Computer Attitude: The Effect of User Involvement , 1989 .

[58]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Predicting school achievement in boys and girls , 2008 .