Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a meta-analysis

Background Intramedullary and extramedullary fixation methods are used in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures. However, whether intramedullary or extramedullary fixation is the primary treatment for subtrochanteric femur fractures in adults remains debatable. Level of evidence Meta-analyses of prospective studies, level I. Materials and methods The Cochrane library, Embase, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases were searched separately for all relevant studies published before January 1, 2015. No language restriction was applied. Prospective randomized controlled trials that compared intramedullary or extramedullary internal fixation to repair subtrochanteric femur fractures in adults were included. We determined intraoperative data, postoperative complications, fracture fixation complications, wound infection, hospital stay days, and final outcome measures to assess the relative effects of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures in adults. Results Six studies were included in our meta-analysis. The relative risks (RRs) of revision rate was 83% lower (RR, 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 0.60; P=0.006), fixation failure rate was 64% lower (RR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.08; P=0.07), non-union rate was 77% lower (RR, 0.23, 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.81; P=0.02) in the intramedullary group compared with the extramedullary group. No significant differences were found between the intramedullary group and extramedullary group for intraoperative data, postoperative complications, wound infection, hospital stay days or final outcome measures. Conclusion In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that there was no significant difference in intraoperative data, postoperative complications, wound infection, hospital stay days or final outcome measures between intramedullary and extramedullary internal fixation. However, a significant decrease occurred in the rate of fracture fixation complications for patients treated with intramedullary internal fixation, especially in elderly patients. Some differences were not significant, but the treatment of elderly subtrochanteric femur fractures using intramedullary internal fixation is recommended.

[1]  B. Espehaug,et al.  TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Emil H Schemitsch,et al.  Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Fixation for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  P. Hsieh,et al.  Biologic plating versus intramedullary nailing for comminuted subtrochanteric fractures in young adults: a prospective, randomized study of 66 cases. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  I. Harris,et al.  Intramedullary Nailing versus Fixed Angle Blade Plating for Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[5]  K. Alberts,et al.  Functional Outcome in Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures With the Proximal Femoral Nail and the Medoff Sliding Plate , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  P. Jalovaara,et al.  Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients , 2007, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  S. Ponzer,et al.  The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  C. Roberts,et al.  Second Generation Intramedullary Nailing of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study of Fracture Site Motion , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  P. Tornetta Subtrochanteric femur fracture. , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  P. Hoffmeyer,et al.  Treatment of Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures with Use of an Intramedullary Nail or a 95° Screw-Plate: A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  F. Kummer,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  T. Hearn,et al.  Fixation of Segmental Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Biomechanical Study , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J. Vroemen,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the Gamma nail and sliding hip screw. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation. , 1994, Injury.

[15]  P. Goldhagen,et al.  A Prospective Comparative Study of the Compression Hip Screw and the Gamma Nail , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.