Molecular ultrasound imaging using microbubble contrast agents.

Molecular imaging is a new field in bioscience which, by virtue of utilizing a contrast agent or reporter, facilitates early detection of the disease processes before phenotypic changes become apparent. Molecular imaging with ultrasound utilizes contrast agents that bear adhesion ligands designed to bind tissue markers specific for a disease process. Such agents can be detected by ultrasound with a great degree of sensitivity, providing both anatomical reference information as well as additional data such as molecular characteristics of the interrogated region. This review summarizes current applications and challenges of molecular ultrasound imaging and offers future technologies which likely follow as an improvement to the existing techniques. Due to the widespread availability of ultrasound and ease of use, molecular ultrasound imaging is likely to emerge as a powerful diagnostic technique.

[1]  John A Hossack,et al.  Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Molecular imaging with targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles: quantification of the concentration dependence of contrast enhancement for binding to sparse cellular epitopes. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  S. Caruthers,et al.  Molecular imaging and therapy of atherosclerosis with targeted nanoparticles , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[6]  Yang Sun,et al.  Contrast imaging with chirped excitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  S. Radio,et al.  The role of complement in the adherence of microbubbles to dysfunctional arterial endothelium and atherosclerotic plaque. , 2007, Cardiovascular research.

[8]  Fuminori Moriyasu,et al.  Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Eric Tom,et al.  Myocardial Ischemic Memory Imaging With Molecular Echocardiography , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  D. McPherson,et al.  Fibrin targeting of tissue plasminogen activator-loaded echogenic liposomes , 2007, Journal of drug targeting.

[11]  Rolf A. Brekken,et al.  Monitoring Response to Anticancer Therapy by Targeting Microbubbles to Tumor Vasculature , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  L. Masotti,et al.  Subharmonic emissions from microbubbles: effect of the driving pulse shape , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A. Lum,et al.  5A-1 Multi-frequency Array Development for Drug Delivery Therapies: Characterization and First Use of a Triple Row Ultrasound Probe , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[15]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Long-term stability by lipid coating monodisperse microbubbles formed by a flow-focusing device. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  S. Acton,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging of inflammation in high-shear flow. , 2006, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[17]  J. Hossack,et al.  Abstract 3559: Dual-Targeted Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E gene Knockout Mice , 2006 .

[18]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Effect of Microbubble Ligation to Cells on Ultrasound Signal Enhancement: Implications for Targeted Imaging , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[19]  R. Powell,et al.  P2A-8 Lipid-Stabilized Monodisperse Microbubbles Produced by Flow Focusing for Use as Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[20]  S. Acton,et al.  Selectin ligands promote ultrasound contrast agent adhesion under shear flow. , 2006, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[21]  Klaus Ley,et al.  Deformable gas-filled microbubbles targeted to P-selectin. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[22]  F. Moriyasu,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agent, Levovist microbubbles are phagocytosed by Kupffer cells-In vitro and in vivo studies. , 2006, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[23]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound Radiation Force Modulates Ligand Availability on Targeted Contrast Agents , 2006, Molecular imaging.

[24]  D. Henry,et al.  Targeted molecular imaging of prostate cancer using tumor endothelium homing Arg-Arg-Leu peptides. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[26]  P. Schneider,et al.  Contrast-Assisted Ultrasound for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Spontaneously Arising Canine Head and Neck Tumors , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[27]  P. Burns,et al.  Microbubble Contrast for Radiological Imaging: 2. Applications , 2006, Ultrasound quarterly.

[28]  H. Katus,et al.  Therapeutic Use of Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction: A Review of Non-Cardiac Applications , 2006, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[29]  R. Price,et al.  Targeted Therapeutic Applications of Acoustically Active Microspheres in the Microcirculation , 2006, Microcirculation.

[30]  Fabio Cominelli,et al.  Targeting mucosal addressin cellular adhesion molecule (MAdCAM)-1 to noninvasively image experimental Crohn's disease. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[31]  William R Wagner,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agents: in vitro assessment of endothelial dysfunction and multi-targeting to ICAM-1 and sialyl Lewisx. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  M. Okada,et al.  Bolus versus continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent for liver US: initial experience. , 2005, Radiology.

[33]  M. Bendszus,et al.  In vivo molecular imaging of adhesion molecules in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). , 2005, Journal of autoimmunity.

[34]  D. Adam,et al.  Time and pressure dependence of acoustic signals radiated from microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  M. Reinhardt,et al.  Ultrasound derived imaging and quantification of cell adhesion molecules in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by Sensitive Particle Acoustic Quantification (SPAQ) , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Contrast‐Enhanced Sonographic Imaging of Lymphatic Channels and Sentinel Lymph Nodes , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[37]  S. Kaul,et al.  Assessment of Endogenous and Therapeutic Arteriogenesis by Contrast Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Integrin Expression , 2005, Circulation.

[38]  J. H. Kim,et al.  Clinical Use of Renal Perfusion Imaging by Means of Harmonic Sonography With a Microbubble Contrast Agent in Patients After Renal Transplantation , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[39]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound biomicroscopy for xenograft growth analysis. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[40]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[41]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine. , 2005, Cancer research.

[42]  K. Ferrara,et al.  A new imaging strategy using wideband transient response of ultrasound contrast agents , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[43]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. , 2005, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[44]  W. Pitt,et al.  Ultrasonic drug delivery – a general review , 2004, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[45]  T. Yankeelov,et al.  Sonographic Depiction of Microvessel Perfusion , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[46]  S. Radio,et al.  Detection of retained microbubbles in carotid arteries with real-time low mechanical index imaging in the setting of endothelial dysfunction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  P. Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[48]  O. Oralkan,et al.  Forward-viewing CMUT arrays for medical imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[49]  Robert Gurny,et al.  Current methods for attaching targeting ligands to liposomes and nanoparticles. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[50]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[51]  Michael Reinhardt,et al.  Molecular targeting of lymph nodes with L-selectin ligand-specific US contrast agent: a feasibility study in mice and dogs. , 2004, Radiology.

[52]  Klaus Ley,et al.  Binding and detachment dynamics of microbubbles targeted to P-selectin under controlled shear flow. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[53]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[54]  S. Simon,et al.  Ultrasonic Analysis of Peptide- and Antibody-Targeted Microbubble Contrast Agents for Molecular Imaging of αvβ3-Expressing Cells , 2004 .

[55]  KatsufumiMizushige,et al.  Leukocyte-Targeted Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Can Assess the Degree of Acute Allograft Rejection in a Rat Cardiac Transplantation Model , 2004 .

[56]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Detection of Individual Microbubbles of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Imaging of Free-Floating and Targeted Bubbles , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[57]  D. McPherson,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound molecular imaging of atheroma components in vivo. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[58]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Low Force Decelerates L-selectin Dissociation from P-selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 and Endoglycan* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  William R. Wagner,et al.  Modulating Targeted Adhesion of an Ultrasound Contrast Agent to Dysfunctional Endothelium , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[60]  D. Hammer,et al.  Interplay between rolling and firm adhesion elucidated with a cell-free system engineered with two distinct receptor-ligand pairs. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[61]  J. Strzelczyk.  The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2003 .

[62]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.

[63]  S. Kook,et al.  Value of contrast‐enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo‐enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions , 2003, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[64]  E. Wisner,et al.  Sentinel Node Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced Power Doppler Ultrasound Lymphography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[65]  K. Ley.  The role of selectins in inflammation and disease. , 2003, Trends in molecular medicine.

[66]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[67]  Nico De Jong,et al.  Contrast superharmonic imaging: a feasibility study. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[68]  Junru Wu,et al.  Nonlinear behaviors of contrast agents relevant to diagnostic and therapeutic applications. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[69]  Daniel A Hammer,et al.  The state diagram for cell adhesion mediated by two receptors. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[70]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[71]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3. , 2003, Circulation.

[72]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[73]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[75]  H. Nagai,et al.  New method of sentinel node identification with ultrasonography using albumin as contrast agent: a study in pigs. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[76]  E. Chérin,et al.  A new ultrasound instrument for in vivo microimaging of mice. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[77]  S. Kaul,et al.  Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[78]  D. May,et al.  Nondestructive subharmonic imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[79]  D. McPherson,et al.  Left Ventricular Thrombus Enhancement After Intravenous Injection of Echogenic Immunoliposomes: Studies in a New Experimental Model , 2002, Circulation.

[80]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Microvascular rheology of Definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[81]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Imaging of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury Using Leukocyte-Targeted Contrast Echocardiography , 2002, Circulation.

[82]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[83]  D. McPherson,et al.  A Physiologic Flow Chamber Model to Define Intravascular Ultrasound Enhancement of Fibrin Using Echogenic Liposomes , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[84]  George A. Brock-Fisher.  Contrast agent imaging with suppression of nonlinear tissue response , 2002 .

[85]  P. Winter,et al.  Molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery with a novel, ligand-directed paramagnetic nanoparticle technology. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[86]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Super harmonic imaging: a new imaging technique for improved contrast detection. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[87]  Y. Kono,et al.  Sentinel lymph node imaging with microbubble ultrasound contrast material. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[88]  D. McPherson,et al.  Improving ultrasound reflectivity and stability of echogenic liposomal dispersions for use as targeted ultrasound contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[89]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of microbubbles , 2001 .

[90]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[91]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Myocardial contrast agents: recent advances and future directions. , 2001, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[92]  E. Gertz,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis With Power Doppler Imaging , 2001, Circulation.

[93]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications , 2001 .

[94]  S. Slack,et al.  Particle diameter influences adhesion under flow. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[95]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Optical and acoustical dynamics of microbubble contrast agents inside neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[96]  C. Smith,et al.  Possible Steps Involved in the Transition to Stationary Adhesion of Rolling Neutrophils: A Brief Review , 2000, Microcirculation.

[97]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of inflammation by ultrasound detection of phagocytosed microbubbles. , 2000, Circulation.

[98]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[99]  J. G. Miller,et al.  In vivo molecular imaging of stretch-induced tissue factor in carotid arteries with ligand-targeted nanoparticles. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[100]  J G Miller,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Current and Future Applications , 2000 .

[101]  F Forsberg,et al.  Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[102]  N de Jong,et al.  Detection procedures of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[103]  S. Kaul,et al.  Microbubble persistence in the microcirculation during ischemia/reperfusion and inflammation is caused by integrin- and complement-mediated adherence to activated leukocytes. , 2000, Circulation.

[104]  J Sklenar,et al.  Assessment of resting perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography: theoretical and practical considerations. , 2000, American heart journal.

[105]  David Needham,et al.  The Influence of Tiered Layers of Surface-Grafted Poly(ethylene glycol) on Receptor−Ligand-Mediated Adhesion between Phospholipid Monolayer-Stabilized Microbubbles and Coated Glass Beads , 2000 .

[106]  E Krupinski,et al.  The use of a thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent to detect thrombus in arteriovenous fistulae. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[107]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[108]  C. Zhu,et al.  Kinetics and mechanics of cell adhesion. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[109]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[110]  N. Pandian,et al.  Enhanced visualization of intravascular and left atrial appendage thrombus with the use of a thrombus-targeting ultrasonographic contrast agent (MRX-408A1): In vivo experimental echocardiographic studies. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[111]  Michel Schneider,et al.  Characteristics of SonoVue™ , 1999 .

[112]  S. Rosen,et al.  Commentary Endothelial Ligands for L-Selectin From Lymphocyte Recirculation to Allograft Rejection , 1999 .

[113]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[114]  R. Cummings,et al.  A Novel Glycosulfopeptide Binds to P-selectin and Inhibits Leukocyte Adhesion to P-selectin* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[115]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[116]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Subharmonic Imaging with Microbubble Contrast Agents: Initial Results , 1999, Ultrasonic imaging.

[117]  P M Shankar,et al.  Subharmonic generation from ultrasonic contrast agents. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[118]  D. McPherson,et al.  In vivo targeting of acoustically reflective liposomes for intravascular and transvascular ultrasonic enhancement. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[119]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Albumin microbubble persistence during myocardial contrast echocardiography is associated with microvascular endothelial glycocalyx damage. , 1998, Circulation.

[120]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Microbubbles targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 bind to activated coronary artery endothelial cells. , 1998, Circulation.

[121]  E. Unger,et al.  In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[122]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[123]  S. Kaul,et al.  Recent advances in myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1997, Current opinion in cardiology.

[124]  W. Wagner,et al.  Albumin microbubble adherence to human coronary endothelium: implications for assessment of endothelial function using myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[125]  T. Springer,et al.  Rolling and transient tethering of leukocytes on antibodies reveal specializations of selectins. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[126]  K. Schwarz,et al.  Harmonic imaging with Levovist. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[127]  J. G. Miller,et al.  A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. , 1996, Circulation.

[128]  F Forsberg,et al.  On the feasibility of real‐time, in vivo harmonic imaging with proteinaceous microspheres. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[129]  S. Kaul,et al.  Relation between air-filled albumin microbubble and red blood cell rheology in the human myocardium. Influence of echocardiographic systems and chest wall attenuation. , 1996, Circulation.

[130]  P. Burns.  Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[131]  F Forsberg,et al.  Parenchymal enhancement and tumor visualization using a new sonographic contrast agent. , 1995, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[132]  D. Hammer,et al.  Lifetime of the P-selectin-carbohydrate bond and its response to tensile force in hydrodynamic flow , 1995, Nature.

[133]  S. Kaul,et al.  In vivo myocardial kinetics of air-filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. , 1994, Circulation research.

[134]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. , 1994, Science.

[135]  T. Springer.  Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: The multistep paradigm , 1994, Cell.

[136]  T. Springer,et al.  Leukocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: Distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins , 1991, Cell.

[137]  W. Spotnitz,et al.  Intraoperative assessment of regional myocardial perfusion using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography: an experimental evaluation. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[138]  John M. Reid,et al.  Scattering of Ultrasound by Blood , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[139]  R. Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.