A comparison of two unsupervised approaches to accent identification

The ability to automatically identify a speaker’s accent would be very useful for a speech recognition system as it would enable the system to use both a pronunciation dictionary and speech models specific to the accent, techniques which have been shown to improve accuracy. Here, we describe some experiments in unsupervised accent classification. Two techniques have been investigated to classify Britishand Americanaccented speech: an acoustic approach, in which we analyse the pattern of usage of the distributions in the recogniser by a speaker to decide on his most probable accent, and a high-level approach in which we use a phonotactic model for classification of the accent. Results show that both techniques give excellent performance on this task which is maintained when testing is done on data from an independent dataset.

[1]  R. W. King,et al.  Automatic accent classification of foreign accented Australian English speech , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[2]  Y. Patel,et al.  An integrated multi-dialect speech recognition system with optional speaker adaptation , 1995, EUROSPEECH.

[3]  Marc A. Zissman,et al.  Comparison of : Four Approaches to Automatic Language Identification of Telephone Speech , 2004 .

[4]  Stephen J. Cox,et al.  Confidence measures for the SWITCHBOARD database , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Philip C. Woodland,et al.  The use of accent-specific pronunciation dictionaries in acoustic model training , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).