Family type and fertility in rural India: a critical analysis

Summary This paper, based on data from two independent but concurrent studies, seeks to show that the explanation for the inconclusive results concerning fertility and family type in India lies in the failure of previous researchers to take account of an important intervening variable, the family life cycle. Fertility levels are examined in nuclear and joint families in a village in Western India and changes in relationships at different stages in the family cycle are considered. The most important conclusion is that aggregate level observations which indicate that fertility varies according to family type are misleading. When other relevant factors such as age or stage in the family life cycle are controlled, there is little evidence of any intrinsic connection between fertility and family type.

[1]  C. Vlassoff The status of women in rural India: a village study. , 1982, Social action.

[2]  C. Vlassoff Unmarried Adolescent Females in Rural India: A Study of the Social Impact of Education. , 1980 .

[3]  M. Vlassoff Labour Demand and Economic Utility of Children: A Case Study in Rural India , 1979 .

[4]  K. Mahadevan Sociology of Fertility: Determinants of Fertility Differentials in South India , 1978 .

[5]  J. Caldwell A theory of fertility: from high plateau to destabilization. , 1978 .

[6]  C. Vlassoff Significance of cultural tradition for contraceptive change: A study of rural Indian women , 1978 .

[7]  M. Vlassoff Economic motives and fertility in an Indian village , 1978 .

[8]  Prafulla C. Bebarta,et al.  Family type and fertility in India , 1977 .

[9]  John C. Caldwell,et al.  Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. , 1976 .

[10]  K. Dandekar,et al.  Socio-economic change during three five-year plans : based on a study of rural communities during 1953-1966 , 1975 .

[11]  M. Karim Fertility differentials by family type. , 1974, Pakistan development review.

[12]  A. Shah The household dimension of the family in India : a field study in a Gujarat village and a review of other studies , 1974 .

[13]  G. Conklin in a Joint Family System: Correlates of Social Change in Dharwar, India* , 1973 .

[14]  T. K. Burch,et al.  Extended family structure and fertility: some conceptual and methodological issues. , 1970 .

[15]  K. Pakrasi,et al.  The relationship between family type and fertility. , 1967, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[16]  M. Micklin,et al.  The Hindu Joint Family: The Norms and the Numbers , 1966 .

[17]  M. F. Nimkoff,et al.  Comparative Family Systems. , 1966 .

[18]  E. Driver,et al.  Differential Fertility in Central India. , 1965 .

[19]  R. Freedman,et al.  Fertility and Family Planning in Taiwan: A Case Study of the Demographic Transition , 1964, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  J. Stycos Some directions for research on fertility control. , 1958, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[21]  J. Blake,et al.  Social Structure and Fertility: An Analytic Framework , 1956, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[22]  K. Davis Institutional patterns favoring high fertility in underdeveloped areas , 1955 .

[23]  James M. Beshers,et al.  Culture and Human Fertility. , 1956 .