VARIATION IN INTERCEPTION OF THE DIRECT SOLAR BEAM BY TOP CANOPY LAYERS

Leaves that show paraheliotropic movement are inclined at a shallow angle with respect to the horizontal near dawn and dusk, and at a steep angle near solar noon. However, the mean inclination angle is only a first approximation to the distribution of leaf angles, and, as such, is not a good measure of the complexity of the underlying distribution. In order to ascertain the accuracies of statistical summaries of angular data used to measure the orientation of plant leaves for intercepting light, I used cellulation plots to analyze the distribution of leaf angles or cosines of the angle of incidence. Ex- amination of these plots shows that inclinations of leaves in the top canopy layer of individual heliotropic plants are distributed over a wide range of angles during a period of several hours before and after solar noon, but that there is a sharp lower limit to this distribution of angles. Experimental observations show that near midday leaves are inclined at least at some minimum angle with respect to the horizontal. In order to interpret these data, I used a simple model of plant canopy photosynthesis and optimized the distribution of leaf angles to maximize total canopy photosynthesis. The results of this model suggest that the existence of a limit angle may be a function primarily of stress factors, and that the distribution of leaf angles more vertical than the limit angle may be important primarily for maximization of whole-plant photosynthesis.

[1]  I. Forseth,et al.  RAPID LEAF MOVEMENT, MICROCLIMATE, AND WATER RELATIONS OF TWO TEMPERATE LEGUMES IN THREE CONTRASTING HABITATS , 1988 .

[2]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Mathematical models in plant physiology , 1976 .

[3]  F. W. Wiegel,et al.  Optimizing the Canopy Photosynthetic Rate by Patterns of Investment in Specific Leaf Mass , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[4]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Description of leaf orientation and heliotropic response of sunflower using directional statistics , 1975 .

[5]  Ecophysiology of two solar tracking desert winter annuals , 1983, Oecologia.

[6]  A. Lang,et al.  Movements of sunflower leaves over a 24-h period , 1976 .

[7]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Solar tracking response to drought in a desert annual , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Ecophysiology of two solar tracking desert winter annuals , 2004, Oecologia.

[9]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[10]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  CHANGES IN LEAF CHARACTERISTICS OF SPECIES ALONG ELEVATIONAL GRADIENTS IN THE WASATCH FRONT, UTAH. , 1988, American journal of botany.

[11]  E. Batschelet Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[12]  A. Teramura,et al.  Kudzu Leaf Energy Budget and Calculated Transpiration: The Influence of Leaflet Orientation , 1986 .

[13]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Solar tracking by plants. , 1980, Science.

[14]  Ka Schakel,et al.  Reversible Leaflet Movements in Relation to Drought Adaptation of Cowpeas, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp , 1979 .

[15]  AXIAL ROTATION OF ERYTHRINA HERBACEA LEAFLETS , 1984 .

[16]  R. Kawashima Studies on the Leaf Orientation-Adjusting Movement in Soybean Plants : I. The leaf orientation-adjusting movement and light intensity on leaf surface , 1969 .