Visual and Cognitive Demands of Using Apple CarPlay, Google’s Android Auto and Five Different OEM Infotainment Systems

Many in-vehicle information systems (IVIS), also known as infotainment systems, involve complex interactions to perform a task that requires the press of a button, a touch screen or a voice command. These interactions may distract motorists from driving by diverting their eyes and attention from the road and hands from the steering wheel. Prior research sponsored by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety provided a comprehensive assessment of 30 vehicles from a variety of manufacturers and the demand generated by the built-in (native) IVIS when using it to do things like give a voice command to send a text message. However, many manufacturers now provide access to Apple’s CarPlay® and Google’s Android Auto®, which allow the driver to pair a smartphone with the vehicle to perform IVIS tasks through the vehicle’s interface.

[1]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[2]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[3]  Peter Burns,et al.  The importance of task duration and related measures in assessing the distraction potential of in-vehicle tasks , 2010, AutomotiveUI.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[5]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Effects of age and smartphone experience on driver behavior during address entry: a comparison between a Samsung Galaxy and Apple iPhone , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[6]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  EFFECTS OF VISUAL DEMAND AND IN-VEHICLE TASK COMPLEXITY ON DRIVING AND TASK PERFORMANCE AS ASSESSED BY VISUAL OCCLUSION , 1999 .

[7]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[8]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  John W Graham,et al.  Planned missing data designs in psychological research. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[10]  G. A. Young,et al.  Recent Developments in Bootstrap Methodology , 2003 .

[11]  Mijke Rhemtulla,et al.  Planned Missing Data Designs for Developmental Researchers , 2013 .

[12]  Shannon M. Moore,et al.  Cell-phone use diminishes self-awareness of impaired driving , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Driver Workload Metrics Task 2 Final Report , 2006 .

[14]  Ifushi Shimonomoto,et al.  Bench-Marking Drivers' Visual and Cognitive Demands: A Feasibility Study , 2015 .

[15]  Johan Engström,et al.  Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving , 2005 .

[16]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[17]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  Visual distraction while driving: trends in research and standardization , 2001 .

[18]  J. Engström Effects of Visual and Cognitive Distraction on Lane Change Test Performance , 2017 .

[19]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Extending the Detection Response Task to Simultaneously Measure Cognitive and Visual Task Demands , 2016 .

[20]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Effects of an 'Expert Mode' Voice Command System on Task Performance, Glance Behavior & Driver Physiology , 2014, AutomotiveUI.

[21]  D. Strayer,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. Cognitive Distraction While Multitasking in the Automobile , 2022 .

[22]  David G. Kidd,et al.  Considering visual-manual tasks performed during highway driving in the context of two different sets of guidelines for embedded in-vehicle electronic systems , 2017 .

[23]  David G. Kidd,et al.  Multi-modal assessment of on-road demand of voice and manual phone calling and voice navigation entry across two embedded vehicle systems , 2015, Ergonomics.

[24]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Validating Two Assessment Strategies for Visual and Cognitive Load in a Simulated Driving Task , 2016 .

[27]  David L Strayer,et al.  Towards an understanding of driver inattention: taxonomy and theory. , 2014, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[28]  Xuru Ding,et al.  Road-to-Lab: Validation of the Static Load Test for Predicting On-Road Driving Performance While Using Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Devices , 2017 .