The role of morphology in subject–verb number agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish

The goal of the present study was to test the predictions of two contrasting claims about the role of morphology in subject–verb number agreement production. According to the maximalist view described by Vigliocco, Hartsuiker, Jarema, and Kolk, languages with relatively rich inflectional morphology may be more susceptible to the influence of notional number due to the penetration of meaning into the agreement process. An alternative proposed by Eberhard, Cutting, and Bock predicts the opposite: Languages with richer inflectional morphology are less susceptible to notional number because inflectional morphemes filter the effect of number meaning. In the present experiments, utterances differing in notional number properties were elicited from speakers of two varieties of Spanish that vary in morphological richness. In Experiment 1, participants formed sentences with overt subjects. In Experiment 2, they produced sentences with null subjects. Results supported the hypothesis that richer morphology reduces notional effects during agreement production, both within and across languages.

[1]  H. Bergh,et al.  Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .

[2]  Almeida Jacqueline Toribio Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish , 2000 .

[3]  S. Colina No “double plurals” in Dominican Spanish: an optimality-theoretic account , 2006 .

[4]  H. Fowler,et al.  A Dictionary of Modern English Usage , 1926 .

[5]  John M. Lipski Preposed Subjects in Questions: Some Considerations. , 1977 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[7]  William Badecker,et al.  Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production : Evidence from gender and case in Slovak , 2007 .

[8]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex and Syntax Go Hand in Hand: Gender Agreement in Language Production , 1999 .

[9]  K. Bock,et al.  Broken agreement , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Constructing Subject-Verb Agreement in Speech: The Role of Semantic and Morphological Factors , 1995 .

[12]  P. Ureña El español en Santo Domingo , 1943 .

[13]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject – verb agreement , 2004 .

[14]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Morphophonological and conceptual effects on Dutch subject–verb agreement , 2010 .

[15]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Language typology : cross-linguistic studies in syntax , 1983 .

[16]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints , 1996, Cognition.

[17]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Plausibility and grammatical agreement , 2003 .

[18]  Juan Carlos Acuña-Fariña,et al.  The linguistics and psycholinguistics of agreement: A tutorial overview , 2009 .

[19]  G Vigliocco,et al.  Syntactic Accuracy in Sentence Production: The Case of Gender Disagreement in Italian Language-Impaired and Unimpaired Speakers , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[21]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Object Attraction in Subject-Verb Agreement Construction , 2001 .

[22]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French , 1996 .

[23]  Máximo Arturo Jiménez Sabater Más datos sobre el español de la República Dominicana , 1975 .

[24]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex Affects Syntax: Contextual Influences in Sentence Production , 2001 .

[25]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.

[26]  T. Berg The resolution of number conflicts in English and German agreement patterns , 1998 .

[27]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[28]  P. Ureña,et al.  El espanol en Santo Domingo , 1942 .

[29]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement , 2008 .

[30]  Francisco Ordóñez,et al.  Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives , 2006 .

[31]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Agreement and attraction in Russian , 2008 .