Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best–worst method (BWM)

In this competitive world, industries are looking for smart technologies to compete; these technologies help R&D people to explicit the ideas and bring the product to the market at shorter lead times and with affordable cost. Each AM machine has its own unique capabilities in manufacturing a product, utilising materials, material intake and wastages. Machine and material costs are the significant parameters, which play a major role in cost estimation of the prototypes. Costs of both machine and materials are prime factors in AM and it can be helpful for cost reduction due to their uniqueness. However, an alternate strategy is being concentrated on process optimization and consumption of material to reduce the overall cost of the prototype. In this paper, multi criterion decision making (MCDM) technique, namely, best-worst method (BWM), was adopted to select the suitable material for the product. This is along with the end user expectations in AM. In the initial phase, the suitable machine to be selected from the available machines is based on the parameters like cost, accuracy, variety of materials and material wastage. From the variety of materials, the suitable material was selected based on the respondent requirement. The criteria that influenced more in the overall cost of the product manufacture through AM is identified and used. According to BWM, the criteria to be selected by the decision maker based on the respondent expectations are identified. In BWM method, pairwise comparisons are carried out between the best and worst criterion suggested by the decision makers, as that it leads to the selection of the suitable material. Here, a demonstration of such a selection is detailed; this is certainly based on the respondent requirements. The result attained through the proposed methodology can be varied based upon the respondent requirements and further machine availabilities. In conclusion, the end result helps to identify the suitable machine and build materials for the prototype to be produced based on the respondent requirements.

[1]  Harry Bikas,et al.  Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[2]  Joseph Pegna,et al.  Environmental impacts of rapid prototyping: an overview of research to date , 2006 .

[3]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  PRIORITIZED FSN ANALYSIS OF INVENTORY MANAGEMENT IN PRIVATE AND HOSPITAL PHARMACY FOLLOWED BY QUESTIONNAIRE , 2017 .

[4]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Á. Noriega,et al.  Analysis of Factors Influencing the Mechanical Properties of Flat PolyJet Manufactured Parts , 2015 .

[6]  Jeffrey W Stansbury,et al.  3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  Luiz Fernando C. S. Durão,et al.  Internet of Things process selection: AHP selection method , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[8]  J. Rezaei,et al.  A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method , 2016 .

[9]  James Gao,et al.  An overview of knowledge sharing in new product development , 2018 .

[10]  H. S. Byun,et al.  A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method , 2005 .

[11]  Osman Taylan,et al.  Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Vojislav Petrovic,et al.  Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies , 2011 .

[13]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  In search for classification and selection of spare parts suitable for additive manufacturing: a literature review , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[14]  Ali Azarnivand,et al.  Water Scarcity Management in Arid Regions Based on an Extended Multiple Criteria Technique , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[15]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Rapid prototyping process selection using graph theory and matrix approach , 2007 .

[16]  Alejandro H. Espera,et al.  Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers , 2018 .

[17]  Prashant K. Jain,et al.  Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: a review , 2013, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[18]  Mizi Fan,et al.  Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[19]  Diyar Akay,et al.  A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[21]  Xun Xu,et al.  Selection of additive manufacturing processes , 2017 .

[22]  Gi Dae Kim,et al.  A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: Quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost , 2008 .

[23]  S. Talluri,et al.  A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection , 2002 .

[24]  Andrea Bacchetti,et al.  Supply chain implications of additive manufacturing: a holistic synopsis through a collection of case studies , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[25]  S. PrasannaVenkatesan,et al.  Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk , 2016 .

[26]  Sandeep Singhal,et al.  Implementation of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning , 2017 .

[27]  S. Vinodh,et al.  A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[28]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[29]  J. Rezaei,et al.  Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method , 2017 .

[30]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies , 1998 .

[31]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Ardeshir Bahreininejad,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[33]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  On the adoption of additive manufacturing in healthcare: a literature review , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[34]  Soodamani Ramalingam,et al.  Fuzzy interval-valued multi criteria based decision making for ranking features in multi-modal 3D face recognition , 2017, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[35]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[36]  David Bak,et al.  Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter , 2003 .

[37]  Behnam Vahdani,et al.  A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[38]  Abbas Mardani,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 , 2015 .

[39]  Lóránt Tavasszy,et al.  Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method , 2017 .

[40]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Toward generic models for comparative evaluation and process selection in rapid prototyping and manufacturing , 2001 .

[41]  Syed H. Masood,et al.  A rule based expert system for rapid prototyping system selection , 2002 .

[42]  Patrick T. Hester,et al.  An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[43]  L. Lockshin,et al.  Using the best-worst method to examine market segments and identify different influences of consumer choice , 2006 .

[44]  Neal D Kravitz,et al.  Three-dimensional printing technology. , 2014, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[45]  Ehsan Toyserkani,et al.  Control of structural and mechanical properties in bioceramic bone substitutes via additive manufacturing layer stacking orientation , 2015 .

[46]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .