Growth patterns for three generations of an intercross between red junglefowl and chickens selected for low body weight

Growth is a complex and dynamic process that may be measured at a specific point or over a period of time. Compared was the growth of male and female chickens over a three-generation period. Involved were red junglefowl (RJF; Gallus gallus), a line of White Plymouth Rock chickens (LWS; Gallus gallus domesticus) selected for low body weight, and their reciprocal F1 and F2 crosses. In both sexes, Gompertz's description of growth showed that RJF had significantly lower asymptotes, earlier inflection points, and faster growth rates than LWS. Heterosis for these measures was positive for asymptote and negative for growth rate and inflection point. The RJF commenced egg production at a significantly younger age and lower body weight than LWS. Although F1 and F2 reciprocal crosses were similar for body weight and for age at first egg, the F1 reciprocal crosses began lay at significantly younger ages than the F2 crosses and parental lines. When viewed on a physiological basis where age and body weight were simultaneously standardized, both parental lines and reciprocal F1 and F2 crosses had differing rapid and lag growth phases. Overall, sexual dimorphism increased in all populations from hatch to sexual maturity. The LWS males had a longer growth period consistent with their female counterparts who became sexually mature at older ages. Comprehensively, these results indicate additive and nonadditive genetic variation for distinct growth patterns and changes in resource allocation strategies over time.

[1]  L. Andersson,et al.  Asymmetries, heterosis, and phenotypic profiles of red junglefowl, White Plymouth Rocks, and F1 and F2 reciprocal crosses , 2018, Journal of Applied Genetics.

[2]  P. Siegel,et al.  Correlated responses to long‐term divergent selection for 8‐week body weight in female White Plymouth Rock chickens: Sexual maturity , 2017, Poultry science.

[3]  P. Siegel,et al.  Selection for juvenile body weight in chickens: Standardizing for scaling , 2017, Poultry science.

[4]  M. McGilliard,et al.  Phenotypic responses of chickens to long-term, bidirectional selection for juvenile body weight--historical perspective. , 2013, Poultry science.

[5]  P. Siegel,et al.  Reproductive soundness is higher in chickens selected for low as compared with high antibody response. , 2012, Poultry science.

[6]  P. Siegel,et al.  Phenotypic responses of chickens to long-term selection for high or low antibody titers to sheep red blood cells. , 2012, Poultry science.

[7]  P. Siegel,et al.  Genetic diversity and population structure in lines of chickens divergently selected for high and low 8-week body weight. , 2010, Poultry science.

[8]  W. M. Rauw Resource Allocation Theory Applied to Farm Animal Production , 2008 .

[9]  L. Andersson,et al.  Identification of the Yellow Skin Gene Reveals a Hybrid Origin of the Domestic Chicken , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[10]  F. B. Hutt Genetics of the fowl , 1936, Journal of Genetics.

[11]  P. Siegel,et al.  Selection for high production in poultry. , 2008 .

[12]  A. Peterson,et al.  Playing chicken with red junglefowl: identifying phenotypic markers of genetic purity in Gallus gallus , 2007 .

[13]  L. Andersson,et al.  QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross between chicken lines divergently selected for growth. , 2006, Physiological genomics.

[14]  G. Barbato Genetic architecture of growth curve parameters in chickens , 1991, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[15]  P. Siegel,et al.  Growth to sexual maturity of dwarf and nondwarf White Rock chickens divergently selected for juvenile body weight , 1986, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[16]  W. Block Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies , 2002 .

[17]  W. B. Gross,et al.  Effects of Genetic Selection for High or Low Antibody Response on Resistance to a Variety of Disease Challenges and the Relationship of Resource Allocation , 2002, Avian diseases.

[18]  P. Siegel,et al.  Heterosis of growth and reproductive traits in fowl. , 2002, Poultry science.

[19]  L. Varona,et al.  Genetic analysis of growth curve parameters for male and female chickens resulting from selection on shape of growth curve. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[20]  I. Nir,et al.  Aspects of food intake restriction in young domestic fowl: metabolic and genetic considerations , 1996 .

[21]  H. R. Wilson Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability , 1991 .

[22]  H. Knížetová,et al.  Growth curves of chickens with different type of performance , 1985 .

[23]  M. Grossman Comparison of proposed growth curve functions in chickens , 1982 .

[24]  W. Becker,et al.  Growth Patterns of Body and Abdominal Fat Weights in Male Broiler Chickens , 1981 .

[25]  R. Ricklefs Relative Growth, Body Constituents, and Energy Content of Nestling Barn Swallows and Red-Winged Blackbirds , 1967 .

[26]  P. Siegel,et al.  Genetic Variation in the Crow of Adult Chickens , 1965 .

[27]  P. Siegel Selection for Body Weight at Eight Weeks of Age 1. Short term Response and Heritabilities , 1962 .

[28]  F. E. Mussehl,et al.  Relation of Egg Weight to Chick Weight at Hatching. , 1922 .