The Cognitive Underpinnings of Option Generation in Everyday Life Decision-Making: A Latent Variable Analysis

The ability to generate options for action is crucial for everyday life decision-making. In this article, we propose and test a model of the cognitive underpinnings of option generation in everyday life situations. We carried out a laboratory study using measures of a wide range of cognitive functions and asked participants (N = 157) to generate options for actions for different everyday life decision-making scenarios. The results of a latent variable analysis show that the cognitive underpinnings of option generation are consistent across different everyday life situations and, hence, option generation can be conceptualized as a general construct. Moreover, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis reveal that, when controlling for the shared variance among the cognitive processes assessed, verbal fluency, working memory capacity, ideation fluency, and processing speed predicted option generation. These findings suggest that option generation in everyday life situations can be distinguished from other cognitive constructs, such as divergent thinking (in terms of ideas' originality) and long-term memory.

[1]  R. Engle.  Working Memory and Executive Attention: A Revisit , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  T. Schweizer,et al.  Cognitive and Affective Aspects of Creative Option Generation in Everyday Life Situations , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The power of simplicity: a fast-and-frugal heuristics approach to performance science , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Joel Suss,et al.  The effect of time constraint on anticipation, decision making, and option generation in complex and dynamic environments , 2015, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[5]  Ben Greiner,et al.  Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE , 2015, Journal of the Economic Science Association.

[6]  P. Tobler,et al.  Apathy in schizophrenia as a deficit in the generation of options for action. , 2015, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  J. McGrane.  Stevens’ forgotten crossroads: the divergent measurement traditions in the physical and psychological sciences from the mid-twentieth century , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Timo Mäntylä,et al.  Option generation in decision making: ideation beyond memory retrieval , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Patrick K. Belling,et al.  Advancing theory and application of cognitive research in sport: Using representative tasks to explain and predict skilled anticipation, decision-making, and option-generation behavior☆ , 2015 .

[10]  Nienke Meulman,et al.  An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Patrick K. Belling,et al.  Cognitive Processes Supporting Recognition in Complex and Dynamic Tasks , 2014 .

[12]  Rick P. Thomas,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Memory Constraints on Hypothesis Generation and Decision Making on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[13]  A. Meyer,et al.  What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[14]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Creative brains: designing in the real world† , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  A. Kalis,et al.  The effects of caffeine on option generation and subsequent choice , 2014, Psychopharmacology.

[16]  R. Malinow,et al.  Negative learning bias is associated with risk aversion in a genetic animal model of depression , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Roger E. Beaty,et al.  Verbal fluency and creativity: General and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking , 2013 .

[18]  Paul Ward,et al.  Complex Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in a Simulated Task Environment , 2013 .

[19]  A. Kalis,et al.  Why we should talk about option generation in decision-making research , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[20]  M. Miller,et al.  Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models , 2013, Educational and psychological measurement.

[21]  P. Tobler,et al.  The cognitive and neural basis of option generation and subsequent choice , 2013, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[22]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[23]  D. Feltz,et al.  Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  P. Smaldino,et al.  The Origins of Options , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  C. Stein,et al.  Structural equation modeling. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  Rick P. Thomas,et al.  Implications of Cognitive Load for Hypothesis Generation and Probability Judgment , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[27]  A. Mark Williams,et al.  Skill-based differences in option generation in a complex task: a verbal protocol analysis , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[28]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Sonya K. Sterba,et al.  Variability in Parameter Estimates and Model Fit Across Repeated Allocations of Items to Parcels , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.

[31]  M. Raab,et al.  How do people perceive and generate options? , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[32]  Annemarie Kalis,et al.  Weakness of will, akrasia, and the neuropsychiatry of decision making: An interdisciplinary perspective , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[33]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Why Heuristics Work , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[34]  Rick P. Thomas,et al.  Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment. , 2008, Psychological review.

[35]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. , 2007, British journal of psychology.

[36]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[37]  F. Chen.  Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[38]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[40]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[41]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices , 2003 .

[42]  M. Dougherty,et al.  Hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and individual differences in working memory capacity. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[43]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[45]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[46]  R. Friedman,et al.  The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[48]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  T. B. Ward,et al.  The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[51]  R. Bjork,et al.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  G. Klein,et al.  The Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model: Looking Back, Looking Forward , 1997 .

[53]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[54]  Caroline E. Zsambok,et al.  Characteristics of Skilled Option Generation in Chess , 1995 .

[55]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[56]  J. Block.  A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  Examining the Effect of Causal Focus on the Option Generation Process: An Experiment Using Protocol Analysis , 1995 .

[58]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Processing speed as a mental capacity. , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[59]  W. Meredith.  Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[60]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. , 1991 .

[61]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[62]  J. Glover,et al.  Handbook of creativity. , 1989 .

[63]  Joanna L. Y. Ho,et al.  Decision problem structuring: generating options , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[64]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  An evaluation of human act generation performance , 1987 .

[65]  Charles F. Gettys,et al.  Divergent thinking in act generation , 1985 .

[66]  Thomas Mehle.  Hypothesis Generation in an Automobile Malfunction Inference Task. , 1982 .

[67]  F. Barron,et al.  Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality , 1981 .

[68]  C. Gettys,et al.  Predicting Individual Differences in Generation of Hypotheses , 1980 .

[69]  J. Guilford.  Creativity: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow , 1967 .

[70]  P. P. Rickham.  HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION. CODE OF ETHICS OF THE WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. DECLARATION OF HELSINKI. , 1964, British medical journal.

[71]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.