A Comparison of Engagement between the Attention Network Test and a Videogame-Like Version, Called the AttentionTrip

ABSTRACT The concept of attention is pivotal for our understanding of normal and abnormal human performance. The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a frequently used task for measuring three networks of attention (alerting, orienting, and executive control). Inspired by the ANT, the AttentionTrip is a videogame-like task also designed to measure these networks. The primary objective of this study, to compare the ANT and the AttentionTrip on their ability to engage the test-taker, was achieved by having the same participants’ complete measures of user engagement after administration of each test. Whereas both tasks generated robust attention network scores, participants were significantly more engaged by the AttentionTrip. The AttentionTrip thus provides an alternative to the ANT that can sustain participant engagement, making it worth considering for research that involves repeated testing or when studying participants prone to boredom.

[1]  Joshua P. Salmon,et al.  Measuring the components of attention using the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB). , 2015, Psychological assessment.

[2]  Jessica Brown,et al.  Let the games begin: A preliminary study using Attention Process Training-3 and Lumosity™ brain games to remediate attention deficits following traumatic brain injury , 2013, Brain injury.

[3]  Heather L. O'Brien,et al.  The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[4]  Lisa E. Mash,et al.  Brief Report: A Gaming Approach to the Assessment of Attention Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development , 2018, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[5]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Klein,et al.  Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the Attention Network Test. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[7]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  R. Klein,et al.  Repeated Measurement of the Components of Attention With Young Children Using the Attention Network Test: Stability, Isolability, Robustness, and Reliability , 2015 .

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  The AttentionTrip: A game-like tool for measuring the networks of attention , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Jeanne H. Brockmyer,et al.  The Development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A Measure of Engagement in Video Game Playing: Response to Reviews , 2009, Interacting with computers.

[13]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Rumona Dickson,et al.  A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of automated tests for cognitive impairment , 2018, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.