Contextual learning of multiple target locations in visual search

In visual search, detection of a target is faster when a layout of nontarget items is repeatedly encountered, suggesting that contextual invariances can guide attention. Moreover, contextual cueing can also adapt to environmental changes. For instance, when the target undergoes a predictable (i.e., learnable) location change, then contextual cueing remains effective even after the change, suggesting that a learned context is “remapped” and adjusted to novel requirements. Here, we explored the stability of contextual remapping: Four experiments demonstrated that target location changes are only effectively remapped when both the initial and the future target positions remain predictable across the entire experiment. Otherwise, contextual remapping fails. In sum, this pattern of results suggests that multiple, predictable target locations can be associated with a given repeated context, allowing the flexible adaptation of previously learned contingencies to novel task demands.

[1]  Takatsune Kumada,et al.  Probing attentional modulation of contextual cueing , 2007 .

[2]  Markus Conci,et al.  Region segmentation and contextual cuing , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  M. Chun,et al.  Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context , 2002 .

[4]  Angela A. Manginelli,et al.  Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? , 2009, Psychological research.

[5]  Tal Makovski,et al.  Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Intertrial temporal contextual cuing: association across successive visual search trials guides spatial attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  David R Shanks,et al.  Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[8]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Cai,et al.  Sleep and rest facilitate implicit memory in a visual search task , 2009, Vision Research.

[13]  Christophe Phillips,et al.  Implicit Oculomotor Sequence Learning in Humans: Time Course of Offline Processing , 2022 .

[14]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Top-down influences on attentional capture by color changes , 2009, Psychological research.

[16]  T Allison,et al.  Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .

[18]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing , 2007, Visual cognition.

[19]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Markus Conci,et al.  Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Connecting the past with the present: how do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? , 2005, Journal of vision.

[24]  Markus Conci,et al.  Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes , 2011, Psychological research.

[25]  Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,et al.  Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search , 2009 .

[26]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  High-capacity spatial contextual memory , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  J. Enns,et al.  What's next? New evidence for prediction in human vision , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.