Directing nuclear deformation on micropillared surfaces by substrate geometry and cytoskeleton organization.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Karine Anselme | Günter Reiter | G. Reiter | K. Anselme | C. Franz | J. Freund | Jean-Noël Freund | Florent Badique | D. Stamov | P. Davidson | Matthieu Veuillet | Clemens M Franz | Patricia M Davidson | Florent Badique | Dimitar R Stamov | Matthieu Veuillet
[1] D. Brunette,et al. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.
[2] O. Gallet,et al. Plasma fibronectin: three steps to purification and stability. , 1999, Protein expression and purification.
[3] A. Albini,et al. The chemoinvasion assay: a method to assess tumor and endothelial cell invasion and its modulation , 2007, Nature Protocols.
[4] Shulamit Levenberg,et al. Effect of scaffold stiffness on myoblast differentiation. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.
[5] I. Dupin,et al. Nuclear positioning: mechanisms and functions. , 2011, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.
[6] J. Ohayon,et al. The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[7] J. Davie,et al. Nuclear matrix proteins associated with DNA in situ in hormone-dependent and hormone-independent human breast cancer cell lines. , 2000, Cancer research.
[8] Simon Schulz,et al. Early keratinocyte differentiation on micropillar interfaces. , 2007, Nano letters.
[9] E. Holzbaur,et al. Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.
[10] Christopher S. Chen,et al. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[11] Marion Ghibaudo,et al. Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .
[12] E. Bertolino,et al. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina , 2008, Nature.
[13] G. Blobel,et al. Lamin B constitutes an intermediate filament attachment site at the nuclear envelope , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.
[14] Matthew J. Dalby,et al. The role of microtopography in cellular mechanotransduction. , 2012, Biomaterials.
[15] Shyam B. Khatau,et al. The perinuclear actin cap in health and disease , 2010, Nucleus.
[16] J. Jansen,et al. The effect of poly-L-lactic acid with parallel surface micro groove on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. , 1999, Biomaterials.
[17] M. Dembo,et al. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[18] Daniel Gioeli,et al. Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth and Cellular Phenotype , 2010, PloS one.
[19] Maxence Bigerelle,et al. Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 1: Physico-chemical effects , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.
[20] D. G. T. Strange,et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.
[21] S. Etienne-Manneville,et al. Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments mediate actin-driven positioning of the nucleus , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.
[22] Direct assessment of living cell mechanical responses during deformation inside microchannel restrictions , 2011, Biointerphases.
[23] William P King,et al. Myoblast alignment and differentiation on cell culture substrates with microscale topography and model chemistries. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[24] J. Jansen,et al. Growth behavior of fibroblasts on microgrooved polystyrene. , 1998, Biomaterials.
[25] G. Shivashankar. Mechanosignaling to the cell nucleus and gene regulation. , 2011, Annual review of biophysics.
[26] V. Hasırcı,et al. Microstructured Surfaces Cause Severe but Non‐Detrimental Deformation of the Cell Nucleus , 2009 .
[27] M Manimaran,et al. Matrigel coated polydimethylsiloxane based microfluidic devices for studying metastatic and non-metastatic cancer cell invasion and migration , 2007, Biomedical microdevices.
[28] Kris Noel Dahl,et al. In the middle of it all: mutual mechanical regulation between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.
[29] Denis Wirtz,et al. A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] D. Discher,et al. Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[31] J. Lammerding. Mechanics of the nucleus. , 2011, Comprehensive Physiology.
[32] S. Taniguchi,et al. [Cytoskeleton of cancer cells]. , 1986, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.
[33] Harihara Baskaran,et al. A microfluidic imaging chamber for the direct observation of chemotactic transmigration , 2010, Biomedical microdevices.
[34] Maxence Bigerelle,et al. Role of materials surface topography on mammalian cell response , 2011 .
[35] Karine Anselme,et al. Topographically induced self-deformation of the nuclei of cells: dependence on cell type and proposed mechanisms , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[36] M. Textor,et al. Dimensionality Controls Cytoskeleton Assembly and Metabolism of Fibroblast Cells in Response to Rigidity and Shape , 2010, PloS one.
[37] C. Shanahan,et al. Nesprins LINC the nucleus and cytoskeleton. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.
[38] C Rotsch,et al. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[39] Jiandong Ding,et al. Control of cell nucleus shapes via micropillar patterns. , 2012, Biomaterials.
[40] Maxence Bigerelle,et al. Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: Biological aspects , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.
[41] Kevin E. Healy,et al. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] Lorenzo Moroni,et al. Micropatterned hot-embossed polymeric surfaces influence cell proliferation and alignment. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[43] Lydie Ploux,et al. Cell/Material Interfaces: Influence of Surface Chemistry and Surface Topography on Cell Adhesion , 2010 .
[44] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.
[45] T. Shimi,et al. The functions of the nuclear envelope in mediating the molecular crosstalk between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.
[46] J. Spatz,et al. Soft micropillar interfaces of distinct biomechanics govern behaviour of periodontal cells. , 2010, European journal of cell biology.
[47] S. Sen,et al. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.
[48] D. Docheva,et al. Researching into the cellular shape, volume and elasticity of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells by atomic force microscopy , 2007, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.
[49] R. Langer,et al. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.
[50] Y. Wang,et al. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[51] A. Taddei,et al. Re-positioning genes to the nuclear envelope in mammalian cells: impact on transcription. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[52] Claudio G. Rolli,et al. Impact of Tumor Cell Cytoskeleton Organization on Invasiveness and Migration: A Microchannel-Based Approach , 2010, PloS one.
[53] G. Stein,et al. Nuclear matrix proteins distinguish normal diploid osteoblasts from osteosarcoma cells. , 1994, Cancer research.
[54] C. Murphy,et al. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[55] M. Bissell,et al. Gene Expression in the Third Dimension: The ECM-nucleus Connection , 2010, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.
[56] M. Radmacher,et al. Substrate dependent differences in morphology and elasticity of living osteoblasts investigated by atomic force microscopy. , 2000, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.